The stated purpose of Acts 1977, No. 48 is to protect border cities by exempting residents from state income taxes who might otherwise move to Texas; the mere fact that the revenue from the increased sales tax goes into the state treasury does not negate or supersede this purpose. Boyd v. Weiss, 333 Ark. 684, 971 S.W.2d 237 (1998).
Boyd v. Weiss, 971 S.W.2d 237 (Ark. 1998). · cites it 8דThis appeal arises out of a constitutional challenge to Act 48 of 1977, now codified at Ark.Code Ann. § 26-52-601 to -606 (Repl. 1997), which was effective on January 31, 1977.”
Leathers v. Warmark, 19 S.W.3d 27 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 4דThe Warmacks claimed that they were exempt from individual income taxes for those years under the border-city tax exemption, as provided in Ark. Code Ann. §§ 26-52-601 to -607 (Repl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.