Amendments.
The 2005 amendment redesignated former (a)(2)(C) as present (a)(2)(C)(i); and added (a)(2)(C)(ii).
The 2007 amendment, in (a)(2), substituted “on a date” for “or at the next general election” in (B)(ii); and rewrote (C).
The 2009 amendment substituted “§ 7-11-201 et seq.” for “§ 7-5-103(b)” in (a)(2)(C).
Case Notes
Reduction of Tax.
The use of the word “reduced” in subsection (c) of this section does not necessarily imply the possibility of a reduction in the rate of a previously levied tax; the plain language of the provision does not indicate that the overall rate of the tax may be reduced and, rather, provides that the portion of the tax pledged to lease rentals or bonds shall not be reduced. Stilley v. Henson, 342 Ark. 346, 28 S.W.3d 274 (2000).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2000–2000 · leading case: Stilley v. Henson, 28 S.W.3d 274 (Ark. 2000).
Stilley v. Henson, 28 S.W.3d 274 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 10דIn making this argument, Mr Stilley relies upon the following language in Ark. Code Ann. § 26-74-210 (c): Notwithstanding anything in this subchapter to the contrary, in any county in which a local sales and use tax has been adopted in the manner provided for in this subchapter…”
Roberts v. Priest, 20 S.W.3d 376 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 4דArk.Code Ann. §§ 26-74-210; XX-XX-XXX; XX-XX-XXX; XX-XX-XXX; XX-XX-XXX; XX-XX-XXX (Repl.”
Ark. Code Ann. § 26-74-210(c): 1 case
Stilley v. Henson, 28 S.W.3d 274 (Ark. 2000). “In making this argument, Mr Stilley relies upon the following language in Ark. Code Ann. § 26-74-210 (c): Notwithstanding anything in this subchapter to the contrary, in any county in which a local sales and use tax has been adopted in the manner provided for in this subchapter…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.