Ark. Code Ann. » Title 26 Chapter 75
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 26-75-201 (2020)

Purpose

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 25, § 17, as added by Acts 1983, No. 726, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 19-4536; Acts 2001, No. 1561, § 3.

Research References

U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.

Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Tax Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 613.

Case Notes

Cited: WSC, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 302 Ark. 295, 789 S.W.2d 448 (1990).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1990–2000 · leading case: Roberts v. Priest, 20 S.W.3d 376 (Ark. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roberts v. Priest, 20 S.W.3d 376 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 2× “; § 26-74-401; § 26-75-201 et seq.; § 26-75-301 (Repl.1997 & Supp.”
Hasha v. City of Fayetteville, 845 S.W.2d 500 (Ark. 1993). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 26-75-201 — 26-75-223 (1987 & Supp.”
W. Foods, Inc. v. Weiss, 992 S.W.2d 100 (Ark. 1999). · cites it 2× “16,496 to levy a one-half percent sales and use tax, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 26-75-201 (Repl. 1992) et seq.”
WSC, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 789 S.W.2d 448 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 2× “However, gross receipts are regulated under a different statutory scheme, found at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 26-75-201 through 26-75-801 (1987 & Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.