Ark. Code Ann. § 27-14-306 (2020)
Improper use of evidences of registration
- No person shall lend to another any certificate of title, registration certificate, registration plate, special plate, or permit issued to him or her if the person desiring to borrow it would not be entitled to the use thereof, nor shall any person knowingly permit their use by one not entitled thereto, nor shall any person display upon a vehicle any registration certificate, registration plate, or permit not issued for the vehicle or not otherwise lawfully thereon under this chapter.
- Any violation of this section is a misdemeanor.
History. Acts 1949, No. 142, § 77; A.S.A. 1947, § 75-177.
Case Notes
Circuit Court Judge Candidate.
Candidate for circuit court judge was not disqualified from running due to his conviction for a violation of this section, as misdemeanor “infamous crimes” under Ark. Const. Art. 5, § 9 and § 7-1-101 are misdemeanor offenses in which “the finder of fact was required to find, or the defendant to admit, an act of deceit, fraud, or false statement”, and the appellate court could not say that a violation of this section required a finding or admission of deceit, fraud, or false statement. Weeks v. Thurston, 2020 Ark. 64, 594 S.W.3d 23 (2020).
Mental State.
Violation of this section does not necessarily involve dishonesty or false statement, and the Supreme Court overrules Fronterhouse v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 211, on that specific point. Weeks v. Thurston, 2020 Ark. 64, 594 S.W.3d 23 (2020).
While deceit, fraud, or a false statement certainly can be present in a violation of this section, a finder of fact is not required under the statute to find deceit, fraud, or a false statement. Furthermore, only one of the three ways one can violate this section requires a culpable mental state—knowingly permitting. Weeks v. Thurston, 2020 Ark. 64, 594 S.W.3d 23 (2020).
Reasonable Cause.
A violation of this section provides a police officer with reasonable cause to believe that the driver of the vehicle is committing a violation of the law in his presence. Wilburn v. State, 317 Ark. 73, 876 S.W.2d 555 (1994).
There was probable cause to support defendant's arrest where defendant was exceeding the posted speed limit, defendant was driving a car with fictitious tags, which was a crime, and both the vehicle and defendant matched the description of the robbery suspect that the police were given. Medlock v. State, 79 Ark. App. 447, 89 S.W.3d 357 (2002).
Where a police officer ran the tags on a vehicle and learned that it had a fictitious license plate, the officer had probable cause to stop the car; in addition, where police discovered the presence of marijuana inside the vehicle during the traffic stop, the subsequent search of defendant's shoe, which yielded marijuana, was a search incident to a lawful arrest. Thornton v. State, 85 Ark. App. 31, 144 S.W.3d 766 (2004).
Cited: Hazelwood v. State, 328 Ark. 602, 945 S.W.2d 365 (1997); Burris v. State, 330 Ark. 66, 954 S.W.2d 209 (1997).