Ark. Code Ann. § 4-1-103 (2020)
Construction of subtitle to promote its purposes and policies — Applicability of supplemental principles of law
-
This subtitle shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are:
- to simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions;
- to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and agreement of the parties; and
- to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.
- Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this subtitle, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause supplement its provisions.
History. Acts 1961, No. 185, § 1-103; reen. 1967, No. 303, § 1 (1-103); A.S.A. 1947, § 85-1-103; Acts 2005, No. 856, § 3.
Case Notes
Custom.
While the Uniform Commercial Code apparently did not directly contemplate the use of money orders and made no specific provision for them, it is the custom and practice of the business community to accept personal money orders as a pledge of the issuing bank's credit so that a court may consider this custom and practice in construing the legal effect of such instruments. Sequoyah State Bank v. Union Nat'l Bank, 274 Ark. 1, 621 S.W.2d 683 (1981).
Estoppel.
Buyer held to be prevented from asserting defense of statute of frauds under § 4-2-201 because of the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Ralston Purina Co. v. McCollum, 271 Ark. 840, 611 S.W.2d 201 (1981).
Executions.
The term “bill of debt” in the current execution statute, § 16-66-201(5), is meaningless because the law in this area is superseded by the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code. In re Frazier, 136 B.R. 199 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 1991).
Cited: Pachter, Gold & Schaffer v. Yantis, 742 F. Supp. 544 (W.D. Ark. 1990); TB of Blytheville, Inc. v. Little Rock Sign & Emblem, Inc., 328 Ark. 688, 946 S.W.2d 930 (1997); Metro. Nat'l Bank v. La Sher Oil Co., 81 Ark. App. 269, 101 S.W.3d 252 (2003).