This chapter shall be known and may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code — Sales.
History.
Acts 1961, No. 185, § 2-101; 1967, No. 303, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 85-2-101.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Carroll, Uniform Laws in Arkansas, 52 Ark. L. Rev. 313.
Evolving Sales Law: Highlights of the Shifting Landscape of Arkansas Purchasing Law, 57 Ark. L. Rev. 835.
Notes of Decisions
Wallis v. Ford Motor Co., 208 S.W.3d 153 (Ark. 2005).
· cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 4-2-101 et seq. (Repl. 2001).”
Midland Dev., Inc. v. Pine Truss, Inc., 750 S.W.2d 62 (Ark. Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 4× “For reversal, appellants raise the following questions: (1) Whether the effect of the Wingo Act prohibits set-off as well as rescission and restitution upon failure of the breaching party to provide conforming goods in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code, Article 2, as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.