Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 4-2-101 (2020)

Short title

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code — Sales.

History. Acts 1961, No. 185, § 2-101; 1967, No. 303, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 85-2-101.

Research References

Ark. L. Rev.

Carroll, Uniform Laws in Arkansas, 52 Ark. L. Rev. 313.

Evolving Sales Law: Highlights of the Shifting Landscape of Arkansas Purchasing Law, 57 Ark. L. Rev. 835.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2005 · leading case: Wallis v. Ford Motor Co., 208 S.W.3d 153 (Ark. 2005).
Wallis v. Ford Motor Co., 208 S.W.3d 153 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 4-2-101 et seq. (Repl. 2001).”
Midland Dev., Inc. v. Pine Truss, Inc., 750 S.W.2d 62 (Ark. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “For reversal, appellants raise the following questions: (1) Whether the effect of the Wingo Act prohibits set-off as well as rescission and restitution upon failure of the breaching party to provide conforming goods in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code, Article 2, as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.