Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 5-2-622 (2020)

Gambling debts and losses

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is no defense to a prosecution for a crime of violence that a person was seeking recovery or replevin of a gambling debt or loss in circumstances in which civil recovery is permitted by § 16-118-103.

History. Acts 2009, No. 460, § 1.

A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2009, No. 460, § 3, provided: “It is the intent of this Act to overrule Daniels v. State, 373 Ark. 536, ___ S.W.3d ___ (2008), and its interpretation of § 16-118-103(a)(1). That case and its interpretation of replevin and the holding in Davidson v. State, 200 Ark. 495, 139 S.W.2d 409 (1940), are contrary to the public policy of this State.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Heard v. State, 2009 Ark. 546, 354 S.W.3d 49.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Heard v. State, 2009 Ark. 546, 354 S.W.3d 49. · cites it 2× “Finally, Act 460 also amended Title 5 to insert Ark.Code Ann. § 5-2-622 (Supp.2009), in the subdivision governing justification, to provide that "[i]t is no defense to a prosecution for a crime of violence that a person was seeking recovery or replevin of a gambling debt or loss…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.