Amendments.
The 2009 amendment rewrote the section.
Case Notes
Sentencing.
Upon the revocation of defendant's probation for eight violations of the Arkansas Hot Check Law under this section, the trial court was authorized under subdivision (d)(2) of this section and § 5-4-309(f)(1)(A) to modify the original order and impose multiple sentences of imprisonment to be served consecutively in accordance with § 5-4-403(a). The trial court did not err by sentencing defendant to twenty years in prison each on four hot-check counts to run consecutively and ten years in prison each on the other felony hot-check counts to run concurrently.
Maldonado v. State, 2009 Ark. 432 (2009).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1999–2014 · leading case: State v. Havens, 987 S.W.2d 686 (Ark. 1999).
State v. Havens, 987 S.W.2d 686 (Ark. 1999). · cites it 2דThe State brings this appeal of the trial court’s ruling, arguing that the trial court erred in dismissing the charges against appellee by finding that the notice provision was a condition precedent to a prosecution under the Arkansas Hot Check Law.”
Bohannon v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 434, 439 S.W.3d 735. “On or about November 17, 2004, the State filed a criminal information against appellant accusing her of violating the Arkansas Hot Check Law — (in amounts of less than $2500 but more than $200)— regarding multiple checks on Simmons First National Bank payable to various…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.