Arkansas Code Annotated
Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-311 (2020)
[Repealed.]
✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning discharge and dismissal, was repealed by Acts 2011, No. 570, § 13. The section was derived from Acts 1975, No. 280, § 1210; 1977, No. 474, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-1210; Acts 1995, No. 998, § 1; 1999, No. 1407, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1994–2014 · leading case: State v. Burnett, 249 S.W.3d 141 (Ark. 2007).
State v. Burnett, 249 S.W.3d 141 (Ark. 2007). “The State filed an objection on June 29, 2005, submitting that Burnett’s incarceration pursuant to the judgment and commitment order made him ineligible for the benefits of expungement under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-311 (Repl. 1997). The circuit court entered an order filed on March…”
Harrell v. State, 962 S.W.2d 325 (Ark. 1998). “On this issue, we note that the appellants’ abstract reflects no conviction judgment imposing a fine, and point out that, under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-311 (Repl. 1997), if a judgment of conviction is not entered at the time of probation, the court must later discharge the…”
Baker v. State, 884 S.W.2d 603 (Ark. 1994). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-311 (Repl. 1993). Here, Baker received only probation — no fine or prison term.”
Summerford v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 209. “Additionally, he asserts that he fully complied with the terms of his suspended sentence; thus, under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-4-311, the court was obligated to discharge and dismiss any proceedings against him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.