Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (2026)

[Repealed.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning criminal penalties, was repealed by Acts 2011, No. 570, § 33. The section was derived from Acts 1971, No. 590, Art. 4, § 1; 1972 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 1; 1972 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 68, § 1; 1973, No. 186, §§ 2, 3; 1975, No. 305, § 2; 1977, No. 557, § 1; 1983, No. 306, § 1; 1983, No. 417, § 1; 1983, No. 787, §§ 3-5; 1985, No. 165, § 1; 1985, No. 472, § 1; 1985, No. 512, § 1; 1985, No. 669, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 82-2617; Acts 1989 (3rd Ex. Sess.), No. 82, §§ 1, 2; 1994 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 10, § 1; 1994 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 46, § 1; 1997, No. 1142, § 1; 1999, No. 1268, § 2; 2001, No. 753, § 1; 2003, No. 1336, § 2; 2005, No. 1994, § 305[A]; 2007, No. 547, § 1; 2007, No. 827, § 58; 2009, No. 572, § 1; 2009, No. 673, § 1; 2009, No. 748, § 26.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 228 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Baker v. Norris, 255 S.W.3d 466 (Ark. 2007).
Baker v. Norris, 255 S.W.3d 466 (Ark. 2007). · cites it 18× “Subsequent to the hearing, a judgment and commitment order was entered on August 5, 2004, reflecting that Baker entered a negotiated plea of guilty to the offense of possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of Ark. Code Ann. §…”
Jones v. State, 182 S.W.3d 485 (Ark. 2004). · cites it 28× “Appellant was sentenced as an habitual offender, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-501 (Supp.2003), to eight years on the methamphetamine-possession charge and ten years on the drug-paraphernalia charge.”
State v. Hardiman, 114 S.W.3d 164 (Ark. 2003). · cites it 28× “Where section 5-64-401 alone is violated, the felony is treated as a Class Y felony, "[f]or all purposes other than disposition.”
Cothren v. State, 42 S.W.3d 543 (Ark. 2001). · cites it 10× “ed by information in the Cleburne County Circuit Court with one count of manufacturing a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in an amount greater than 200 grams and less than 400 grams and one count of possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) with intent to…”
Thomason v. State, 208 S.W.3d 830 (Ark. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 32× “1997) provides that no person shall unlawfully commit a felony drug offense under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64-401 or unlawfully attempt, solicit, or conspire to commit a felony offense under section 5-64-401 while in *837 the possession of a firearm.”
Rabb v. State, 39 S.W.3d 11 (Ark. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 13× “” While there is no argument that the State proved that appellant possessed a large amount of methamphetamine, she argues that no evidence was presented to indicate her intentions toward the controlled substance.”
Renshaw v. Norris, 989 S.W.2d 515 (Ark. 1999). · cites it 12× “Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (a)(1)(ii) (1987).”
Stanton v. State, 42 S.W.3d 474 (Ark. 2001). · cites it 7× “1997) provides in pertinent part: “Manufacture” means the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, conversion, or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical…”
Walley v. State, 112 S.W.3d 349 (Ark. 2003). · cites it 5× “He was also found guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine under § 5-64-403(c)(2)(A): “It is unlawful for any person to . . . possess . . . drug paraphernalia, knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that it…”
Darrough v. Kelley, 2017 Ark. 314 (Ark. 2017). · cites it 8× “Darrough was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent-to deliver and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver—both of which fall under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64-401(a), not subsection (c). In Sossamon, the appellant was convicted of simple possession…”
State v. O'Quinn, 427 S.W.3d 668 (Ark. 2013). · cites it 18× “One of O’Quinn’s two convictions was manufacturing methamphetamine, a Class Y felony, and, although it has since been repealed, the applicable sentencing statute at the time was Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-401. The statute provided in pertinent part: (a) Controlled Substance —…”
Rowbottom v. State, 13 S.W.3d 904 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 7× “The two statutes at issue in the instant case are Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (a)(l)(i) (Supp.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a) — 17 cases
State v. Hardiman, 114 S.W.3d 164 (Ark. 2003). “Where section 5-64-401 alone is violated, the felony is treated as a Class Y felony, "[f]or all purposes other than disposition.”
Darrough v. Kelley, 2017 Ark. 314 (Ark. 2017). “Darrough was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent-to deliver and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver—both of which fall under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64-401(a), not subsection (c). In Sossamon, the appellant was convicted of simple possession…”
Phavixay v. State, 282 S.W.3d 795 (Ark. 2008).
Hales v. State, 771 S.W.2d 285 (Ark. 1989).
Williams v. State, 944 S.W.2d 822 (Ark. 1997).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(1) — 6 cases
Jones v. State, 182 S.W.3d 485 (Ark. 2004). “Appellant was sentenced as an habitual offender, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-501 (Supp.2003), to eight years on the methamphetamine-possession charge and ten years on the drug-paraphernalia charge.”
White v. State, 255 S.W.3d 881 (Ark. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. O'Quinn, 427 S.W.3d 668 (Ark. 2013). “One of O’Quinn’s two convictions was manufacturing methamphetamine, a Class Y felony, and, although it has since been repealed, the applicable sentencing statute at the time was Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-401. The statute provided in pertinent part: (a) Controlled Substance —…”
Cridge v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 153 (Ark. 2014).
Bustillos v. State, 425 S.W.3d 44 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
Bustillos v. State, 425 S.W.3d 44 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(1)(A)(i) — 1 case
Holt v. State, 348 S.W.3d 562 (Ark. 2009).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(1)(i) — 6 cases
Renshaw v. Norris, 989 S.W.2d 515 (Ark. 1999). “Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (a)(1)(ii) (1987).”
Jones v. State, 182 S.W.3d 485 (Ark. 2004). “Appellant was sentenced as an habitual offender, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-501 (Supp.2003), to eight years on the methamphetamine-possession charge and ten years on the drug-paraphernalia charge.”
Henderson v. State, 910 S.W.2d 656 (Ark. 1995).
Pennington v. State, 808 S.W.2d 780 (Ark. 1991).
Strong v. State, 242 S.W.3d 620 (Ark. 2006).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(2) — 1 case
Holt v. State, 290 S.W.3d 21 (Ark. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(4) — 1 case
Richie v. State, 337 S.W.3d 529 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l) — 2 cases
Holt v. State, 290 S.W.3d 21 (Ark. Ct. App. 2008).
Heydenrich v. State, 379 S.W.3d 507 (Ark. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(A)(i) — 3 cases
State v. O'Quinn, 427 S.W.3d 668 (Ark. 2013). “One of O’Quinn’s two convictions was manufacturing methamphetamine, a Class Y felony, and, although it has since been repealed, the applicable sentencing statute at the time was Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-401. The statute provided in pertinent part: (a) Controlled Substance —…”
Phavixay v. State, 352 S.W.3d 311 (Ark. 2009).
Bustillos v. State, 425 S.W.3d 44 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(A)(ii) — 1 case
State v. O'Quinn, 427 S.W.3d 668 (Ark. 2013). “One of O’Quinn’s two convictions was manufacturing methamphetamine, a Class Y felony, and, although it has since been repealed, the applicable sentencing statute at the time was Ark.Code Ann. § 5-64-401. The statute provided in pertinent part: (a) Controlled Substance —…”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(B)(i) — 1 case
Robelo v. State, 421 S.W.3d 329 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(C)(i) — 1 case
Bustillos v. State, 425 S.W.3d 44 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(D)(i) — 1 case
Bustillos v. State, 425 S.W.3d 44 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(i) — 3 cases
Buckley v. State, 20 S.W.3d 331 (Ark. 2000).
Strong v. State, 242 S.W.3d 620 (Ark. 2006).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(a)(l)(iv) — 1 case
State v. Landis, 870 S.W.2d 705 (Ark. 1994).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(b) — 2 cases
Gordon v. State, 931 S.W.2d 91 (Ark. 1996).
Jackson v. State, 165 S.W.3d 467 (Ark. Ct. App. 2004).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(b)(l)(i) — 1 case
Abbott v. State, 819 S.W.2d 694 (Ark. 1991).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(c) — 10 cases
Jones v. State, 182 S.W.3d 485 (Ark. 2004). “Appellant was sentenced as an habitual offender, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-501 (Supp.2003), to eight years on the methamphetamine-possession charge and ten years on the drug-paraphernalia charge.”
Darrough v. Kelley, 2017 Ark. 314 (Ark. 2017). “Darrough was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent-to deliver and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver—both of which fall under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64-401(a), not subsection (c). In Sossamon, the appellant was convicted of simple possession…”
Harbison v. State, 790 S.W.2d 146 (Ark. 1990).
Thomason v. State, 208 S.W.3d 830 (Ark. Ct. App. 2005). “1997) provides that no person shall unlawfully commit a felony drug offense under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64-401 or unlawfully attempt, solicit, or conspire to commit a felony offense under section 5-64-401 while in *837 the possession of a firearm.”
Sossamon v. State, 789 S.W.2d 738 (Ark. Ct. App. 1990).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(c)(1) — 1 case
Draper v. State, 378 S.W.3d 191 (Ark. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(c)(l) — 1 case
Draper v. State, 378 S.W.3d 191 (Ark. Ct. App. 2010).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(d) — 8 cases
Thomason v. State, 208 S.W.3d 830 (Ark. Ct. App. 2005). “1997) provides that no person shall unlawfully commit a felony drug offense under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-64-401 or unlawfully attempt, solicit, or conspire to commit a felony offense under section 5-64-401 while in *837 the possession of a firearm.”
White v. State, 765 S.W.2d 949 (Ark. 1989).
Williams v. State, 420 S.W.3d 487 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012).
Rabb v. State, 39 S.W.3d 11 (Ark. Ct. App. 2001). “” While there is no argument that the State proved that appellant possessed a large amount of methamphetamine, she argues that no evidence was presented to indicate her intentions toward the controlled substance.”
Dodson v. State, 191 S.W.3d 511 (Ark. 2004).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(d)(3)(A)(ix) — 1 case
Singleton v. State, 381 S.W.3d 874 (Ark. Ct. App. 2011).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(f) — 1 case
Laster v. State, 64 S.W.3d 800 (Ark. Ct. App. 2002).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(g)(1) — 1 case
Holt v. State, 290 S.W.3d 21 (Ark. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401(g)(2) — 1 case
Holt v. State, 290 S.W.3d 21 (Ark. Ct. App. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.