Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 8-4-217 (2020)

Unlawful actions

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. It shall be unlawful for any person to:
    1. Cause pollution, as defined in § 8-4-102, of any of the waters of this state;
    2. Place or cause to be placed any sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes in a location where it is likely to cause pollution of any waters of this state;
    3. Violate any provisions of this chapter or of any rule or order adopted by the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission under this chapter or of a permit issued under this chapter by the Division of Environmental Quality;
    4. Knowingly to make any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this chapter;
    5. Falsify, tamper with, or knowingly render inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this chapter; or
    6. Sell, offer or expose for sale, give, or furnish any synthetic detergent or detergent containing any phosphorus, expressed as elemental phosphorus, including synthetic detergents or detergents manufactured for use as laundry or dishwashing detergents within this state from and after January 1, 1994, except as provided below:
      1. Products that may be used, sold, manufactured, or distributed for use or sale regardless of phosphorus content include:
        1. A detergent:
          1. Used in dairy, beverage, or food processing cleaning equipment;
          2. Used in hospitals, veterinary hospitals, clinics, healthcare facilities, or in agricultural production;
          3. Used by industry for metal cleaning or reconditioning;
          4. Manufactured, stored, or distributed for use or sale outside the state;
          5. Used in any laboratory, including a biological laboratory, research facility, chemical laboratory, and engineering laboratory;
          6. Used in a commercial laundry that provides laundry services for a hospital, healthcare facility, or veterinary hospital; or
          7. Used for surface cleaning, appliance cleaning, or specialty home cleaning, and not for dishwashing or laundry;
        2. A phosphoric acid product, including a sanitizer, brightener, acid cleaner, or metal conditioner; and
        3. A substance the division excludes from the phosphorus limitations of this section based on a finding that compliance with this section would:
          1. Create a significant hardship on the user; or
          2. Be unreasonable because of the lack of an adequate substitute cleaning agent that could be substituted for the subject cleaning agent without significant cost or effect differences;
      2. A person may use, sell, manufacture, or distribute for use or sale a laundry detergent that contains five-tenths percent (.5%) phosphorus or less that is incidental to manufacturing; and
      3. A person may use, sell, manufacture, or distribute for use or sale a dishwashing detergent that contains eight and seven-tenths percent (8.7%) phosphorus or less by weight.
    1. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in any of the following acts without having first obtained a written permit from the division:
      1. To construct, install, modify, or operate any disposal system or any part thereof, or any extension or addition thereto, that will discharge into any of the waters of this state;
      2. To increase in volume or strength any sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes in excess of the permissive discharges specified under any existing permit;
      3. To construct, install, or operate any building, plant, works, establishment, or facility, or any extension or modification thereof, or addition thereto, the operation of which would result in discharge of any wastes into the waters of this state or would otherwise alter the physical, chemical, or biological properties of any waters of this state in any manner not already lawfully authorized;
      4. To construct or use any new outlet for the discharge of any wastes into the waters of this state; or
      5. To discharge sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes into any of the waters of this state.
    2. The division may require the submission of such plans, specifications, and other information as it deems relevant in connection with the issuance of disposal permits.

History. Acts 1949, No. 472, [Part 1], § 8; 1961, No. 120, § 7; 1973, No. 262, § 9; 1975, No. 743, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 82-1908; Acts 1993, No. 454, § 1; 1993, No. 461, § 1; 1997, No. 1219, § 5; 2019, No. 315, § 475; 2019, No. 910, §§ 2503-2506.

A.C.R.C. Notes. As originally amended by identical Acts 1993, Nos. 454 and 461, § 1, subdivisions (a)(6)(B) and (a)(6)(C) began “After January 1, 1994.”

Amendments. The 2019 amendment by No. 315 deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (a)(3).

The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Division of Environmental Quality” for “Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality” in (a)(3); and substituted “division” for “department” throughout the section.

Research References

Ark. L. Rev.

Noble and Looney, The Emerging Legal Framework for Animal Agricultural Waste Management in Arkansas, 47 Ark. L. Rev. 159.

U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.

Wright, In Storage Tank Funds We Trust: An Analysis of Their Role in Protecting the Environment and Small Business, 13 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 417.

Case Notes

Escape of Dioxin.

Where the record showed that dioxin was escaping from a plant site in quantities that under an acceptable, but unproved, theory could be considered as teratogenic, mutagenic, fetotoxic, and carcinogenic, there was a reasonable medical concern over the public health, and therefore the escape of dioxin into a creek and bayou from the plant site constituted an imminent and substantial endangerment to the health of persons and was subject to abatement. United States v. Vertac Chem. Corp., 489 F. Supp. 870 (E.D. Ark. 1980), aff'd, 961 F.2d 796 (8th Cir. 1992).

Violations.

Where a corporation with an incinerator permit transferred all of its stock to a second corporation, there was substantial evidence to support the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission's conclusion that the first corporation thereby transferred its permitted facility to the second corporation, a transfer prohibited by the permit. Enviroclean, Inc. v. Ark. Pollution Control & Ecology Comm'n, 314 Ark. 98, 858 S.W.2d 116 (1993).

Cited: Arkansas ex rel. Bryant v. Dow Chem. Co., 981 F. Supp. 1170 (E.D. Ark. 1997).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1993–1993 · leading case: EnviroClean, Inc. v. Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology Comm'n, 858 S.W.2d 116 (Ark. 1993).
EnviroClean, Inc. v. Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology Comm'n, 858 S.W.2d 116 (Ark. 1993). · cites it 2× “ADPC&E may revoke a permit for violation of any condition of the permit or when the permit is obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.