Ark. Code Ann. » Title 9 Chapter 17
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-17-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the “Uniform Interstate Family Support Act”.

History. Acts 1993, No. 468, § 1; 2015, No. 888, § 1.

Publisher's Notes. Former § 9-17-101 has been amended and renumbered as § 9-17-102.

Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Vick v. Cecil, 246 S.W.3d 426 (Ark. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vick v. Cecil, 246 S.W.3d 426 (Ark. 2007). · cites it 6× “” Similarly, the term “State” includes “an Indian Tribe” in the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-17-101 through 902 (Repl.”
In Re Adoption of Amc, 246 S.W.3d 426 (Ark. 2007). · cites it 4× “" Similarly, the term "State" includes "an Indian Tribe" in the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, codified at Ark.Code Ann. §§ 9-17-101 through 902 (Repl.”
Jefferson Cnty. Child Support Enf't Unit v. Hollands, 939 S.W.2d 302 (Ark. 1997). · cites it 6× “Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-17-101 to 9-17-905 (Repl.”
State of Washington v. Thompson, 6 S.W.3d 82 (Ark. 1999). · cites it 2× “On May 21, 1998, a child-support enforcement transmittal from the State of Washington was filed in the Pulaski County Chancery Court, seeking registration and enforcement of the Washington order under the provisions of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Ark. Code…”
Off. of Child Support Enf't v. Clemmons, 984 S.W.2d 837 (Ark. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “On January 22, 1998, the chancellor entered an order estopping OCSE or Sheila from obtaining a judgment and/or attempting to collect any child-support arrear-ages based upon the fact that Sheila had willfully concealed Christopher from his father.”
Chaisson v. Ragsdale, 914 S.W.2d 739 (Ark. 1996). · cites it 2× “Arkansas enacted UIFSA in 1993, and it is codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-17-101 et seq. (Repl. 1993).”
Fox v. Fox, 7 S.W.3d 339 (Ark. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Appellee also argued that, under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-17-101 — 9-17-905 (Repl.”
State of Arkansas Off. of Child Support Enf't v. Harnage, 910 S.W.2d 207 (Ark. 1995). “§ 20-76-410 or 20-77-109 is provided to a dependent child; or (2) Whenever a contract and assignment for child support services has been entered into for the establishment or enforcement of a child support obligation for which an assignment under § 20-76-410 is not in effect; or…”
Tyler v. Talburt, 41 S.W.3d 431 (Ark. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “” Ark. Code Ann. § 9-17-101 (18) (Repl. 1998).”
Off. of Child Support Enf't v. Cook, 959 S.W.2d 763 (Ark. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “We agree with appellant that, under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-17-101 through 9-17-905 (Repl.”
Medeiros v. Medeiros, 2017 Ark. App. 122 (Ark. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-17-101 et seq. (Repl.”
State, Off. of Child Support Enf't v. Terry, 985 S.W.2d 711 (Ark. 1999). “or § 20-77-307 is provided to a dependent child; or (2) Whenever a contract and assignment for child support services have been entered into for the establishment or enforcement of a child support obligation for which an automatic assignment under § 9-14-109 is not in effect; or…”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.