This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Arkansas Juvenile Code of 1989”.
History.
Acts 1989, No. 273, § 1.
Case Notes
Funding of Court.
Where circuit and chancery judge issued an order setting the salaries of the judicial district's probation officer and intake officer at $18,000.00 per year, and petitioners, members of the county quorum court, voted to pay county's share of the salary, but at the rate of only $15,000.00 per year, petitioners did not fail to fund the court, there was no showing that level of funding was so low that the court could not effectively operate and the inherent authority doctrine did not apply. Abbott v. Spencer, 302 Ark. 396, 790 S.W.2d 171 (1990).
Judkins v. Duvall, 248 S.W.3d 492 (Ark. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2דArk. Code Ann. § 9-27-301 et seq. Appellant’s final argument for reversal is that the trial court erred in finding that it was in Braydon’s best interest to grant custody of him to his father.”
Patterson v. R.T., 784 S.W.2d 777 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 4דelow that appellants, the Department of Human Services and Walt Patterson, Director of the Department, had failed to provide the same reunification services to the members of the class that are provided to parents, guardians, or custodians and their children where the children…”
Rosario v. State, 894 S.W.2d 888 (Ark. 1995). · cites it 2דis Act 273 of 1989, codified as Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-27-301 to -368 (Repl.”
Nance v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 870 S.W.2d 721 (Ark. 1994). · cites it 3דSection 9-27-306(a)(1) grants juvenile courts exclusive original jurisdiction of proceedings in which a juvenile is alleged to be dependent-neglected. Section 9-27-334(a)(2) allows a juvenile court, pursuant to a finding that a juvenile is dependent-neglected, to transfer…”
Robinson v. Sutterfield, 786 S.W.2d 572 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 2דArk. Code Ann. § 9-27-306 (a)(l) (Supp. 1989).”
Valdez v. State, 801 S.W.2d 659 (Ark. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2דThe Juvenile Code of 1989 is codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-301 etseq. (Supp. 1989).”
Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. v. Bailey, 885 S.W.2d 677 (Ark. 1994). · cites it 2דIn the instant case, DHS’s name was never shown in the style of the case until this appeal and the state never entered an appearance by any type of pleading.”
Hudson v. Kyle, 101 S.W.3d 202 (Ark. 2003). · cites it 2ד(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Arkansas Juvenile Code of 1989, § 9-27-301 et seq., or any other enactment which might be interpreted otherwise, the chancery court or any division of chancery court shall have jurisdiction for all cases and matters relating to paternity.”
Patterson v. Isom, 992 S.W.2d 792 (Ark. 1999). “(3) The juvenile division of chancery court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of paternity matters which arise during pendency of original proceedings brought pursuant to the Arkansas Juvenile Code of 1989, § 9-27-301, et seq.”
Abbott v. Spencer, 790 S.W.2d 171 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 2דAct 273 of 1989, the Juvenile Code of 1989, codified as Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-27-301 to -344 (Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.