Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-28-1003 (2020)

Safeguards for children in foster care

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. Special safeguards, resources, and care should be provided to children involved in dependency-neglect cases who are in foster care or in an out-of-home placement because of the temporary or permanent separation from parents.
  2. A child in foster care in the State of Arkansas shall be entitled to the following:
    1. To be cherished by a family of his or her own;
    2. To be nurtured by foster parents who have been selected to meet his or her individual needs;
    3. To be heard and involved with the decisions of his or her life;
    4. To have complete information and direct answers to his or her questions about choices, services, and decisions;
    5. To be informed about and have involvement when appropriate with his or her birth family and siblings;
    6. To have reasonable access to his or her caseworker or a person in the Department of Human Services who can make decisions on his or her behalf;
    7. To express his or her opinion and have it treated respectfully;
    8. To request support and services that he or she needs;
    9. To have individualized care and attention;
    10. To have ongoing contact with significant people in his or her life, such as teachers, friends, personal support, and relatives;
    11. To be notified of changes impacting his or her permanence, safety, stability, or well-being;
    12. To have a stable, appropriate placement if he or she is placed in foster care;
    13. To receive free appropriate education, training, and career guidance to prepare him or her for a useful and satisfying life;
    14. To receive preparation for citizenship and parenthood through interaction with foster parents and other adults who are consistent role models;
    15. To have reasonable access to and be represented by an attorney ad litem in all juvenile judicial proceedings so that his or her best interests are represented;
    16. To receive quality child welfare services;
    17. To have a plan for his or her future and the support needed to accomplish it;
    18. To receive a copy of his or her case record upon exiting foster care;
    19. To be placed in the custody or foster home of relatives, if appropriate, provided the relative caregiver meets all relevant child protection standards; and
    20. To be cared for without regard to race, gender, religion, or disability.
  3. Sibling relationships are recognized to be unique and separate from the parent-child bond due to the similar history, heritage, culture, and biology of the siblings; and sibling separation is a significant and distinct loss that must be repaired by frequent and regular contact, continuity, and stability during a child's placement in foster care or an out-of-home placement; and each child has the right to know and be actively involved in his or her sibling's lives, absent extraordinary circumstances.
  4. In addition to the safeguards identified under subsection (b) of this section, siblings in foster care or in an out-of-home placement in this state are entitled to the following unless a court specifically finds that it is not in the best interest of the child:
    1. To live together in the same placement;
    2. To be separated only after:
      1. An assessment by a mental health professional determines that placement of the siblings together would be detrimental to the health, safety, or well-being of one (1) or more of the juveniles; or
      2. The department presents evidence to the court that there are no available relevant placements near the county where the juvenile resided before entering care;
    3. If separated, to be placed in close proximity to siblings in order to facilitate frequent and meaningful contact;
    4. If separated, to have visitation with all siblings that shall be:
      1. Regular and consistent;
      2. Include face-to-face meetings or alternate methods of communication at least one (1) time per week when possible; and
      3. Outlined in the case plan and approved by the court;
    5. To be actively involved in each sibling's life and share celebrations including birthdays, holidays, graduations, and meaningful milestones;
    6. To attend extracurricular events of each sibling, including without limitation athletic events, musical performances, scouting ceremonies, and church events;
    7. To be included in case plan staffing decisions and permanency planning decisions regarding siblings;
    8. To be informed of the expectations for continued contact in the event that a sibling is placed or adopted separately from the sibling;
    9. To be notified of a change of placement for a sibling;
    10. To be informed when a sibling is being discharged from foster care;
    11. If a sibling leaves care, to be allowed to maintain contact with a sibling who remains in an out-of-home placement;
    12. To be supported in efforts to maintain relationships with siblings who are not in care or have been adopted or placed in permanent custody or guardianship separately from the child;
    13. To not have visitation or contact with a sibling withheld as a behavioral consequence unless there are documented safety concerns; and
    14. If separated, to have the sibling's case reviewed by the court at least one (1) time every ninety (90) days for an assessment of the separation and to determine whether there has been a reasonable effort to reunite the siblings and to allow contact between the siblings consistent with this section.
  5. A minor who is the custodial parent of one (1) or more children and who is placed in foster care shall be placed in the same placement as the child unless the court has adjudicated the child or children of the minor parent to be dependent-neglected and the court finds that it is not in the best interest of the child or children to be placed in the same placement as the minor parent.

History. Acts 2007, No. 725, § 2; 2015, No. 1017, §§ 13, 14.

Amendments. The 2015 amendment, in (a), inserted “involved in dependency-neglect cases who are” and inserted “or in an out-of-home placement”; and added (c) through (e).

Case Notes

Standing.

Great-grandmother had no right to assert rights under this section where the child's siblings were not in foster care, the great-grandmother was neither a party to the dependency-neglect case nor the child's guardian or custodian, and due to the termination of her grandson's parental rights, the great-grandmother had no legal rights as the child's great-grandmother. Stricklin v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2017 Ark. App. 441, 528 S.W.3d 321 (2017).

Subchapter 11 — Arkansas Coalition for Juvenile Justice Board

[Repealed.]

9-28-1101 — 9-28-1104. [Repealed.]

Publisher's Notes. This subchapter, concerning the Arkansas Coalition for Juvenile Justice Board, was repealed by Acts 2019, No. 938, § 1, effective July 24, 2019. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:

9-28-1101. Acts 2013, No. 1513, § 1; 2017, No. 540, § 8.

9-28-1102. Acts 2013, No. 1513, § 1.

9-28-1103. Acts 2013, No. 1513, § 1.

9-28-1104. Acts 2013, No. 1513, § 1.

Subchapter 12 — Youth Justice Reform Board

A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2015, No. 1010, § 1, provided: “Legislative findings and intent.

“(a) The General Assembly finds that:

“(1) When effective community-based services are not available as an alternative to incarceration, the results are the secure confinement of youths who pose little or no threat to public safety;

“(2) When effective community-based alternatives are in place, use of confinement and commitments to the Division of Youth Services of the Department of Human Services can be reduced with no compromise of public safety; and

“(3) The state can realize significant fiscal savings, while positively impacting the lives of youthful offenders, by encouraging and investing in the use of effective community-based alternatives, and by reserving the use of state commitments and secure confinement for youthful offenders who pose a serious risk to public safety.

“(b) The purpose of this act is to establish a mandate for the provision of services to reduce youth incarceration, and to provide oversight and accountability for the effectiveness of commitment reduction services to the state and to stakeholders in the juvenile justice system.”

Effective Dates. Acts 2019, No. 189, § 15: July 1, 2020.

Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Stricklin v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 2017 Ark. App. 441, 528 S.W.3d 321.
Stricklin v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 2017 Ark. App. 441, 528 S.W.3d 321. · cites it 14× “¡Annotated section 9-28-1003 (Repl. 2015). 2 She alleged that she was entitled to intervene as a matter of right pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) and pursue her petition for adoption.”
Clark v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2019 Ark. App. 223, 575 S.W.3d 578. · cites it 2× “§§ 9-28-105 , -108 (Repl. 2016). This appeal tests whether that policy has real meaning.”
Amanda Borah v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor Child, 2020 Ark. App. 491, 612 S.W.3d 749. · cites it 2× “Amanda contends that placement with relatives is the preferred goal when accomplishing permanency for children, see Ark. Code Ann. § 9-28-1003 (Repl. 2015); Ark.”
Anita Farfan v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor Child, 2022 Ark. App. 438, 654 S.W.3d 849. · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-28-1003 (Repl. 2020) (safeguards for children in foster care); Ark.”
Teasia Turner v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor Child., 2026 Ark. App. 267. · cites it 5× “The trial court noted that the children were not placed together at that time but it ordered sibling visitation and found that DHS had made reasonable efforts to reunite the siblings and to allow contact, consistent with Ark. Code Ann. § 9-28-1003 (d). The trial court also found…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.