Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-8-101 (2020)

Definitions

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this subchapter:

  1. “Child” means a person under eighteen (18) years of age;
  2. “Division” means the Division of Children and Family Services of the Department of Human Services;
  3. “Investigation” means the process of obtaining a home study, home report, home assessment, home evaluation, or marital study;
  4. “Licensed social worker” means a social worker authorized to perform home studies or supervised visits under the Social Work Licensing Act, § 17-103-101 et seq.;
  5. “Rules” means rules promulgated by the division for the purpose of implementing this subchapter pursuant to the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq.;
  6. “Study” means home study, home report, home assessment, home evaluation, or marital study; and
  7. “Supervision” means periodic visitation to the home or school or other places for monitoring or observation to determine a child's situation or condition or to regulate or facilitate visitation and may include court appearances to provide testimony on the visitation.

History. Acts 1991, No. 1081, § 1; 2001, No. 1420, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 703.

Publisher's Notes. Former § 9-8-101, concerning the fee for court-ordered investigations, etc., of children not being provided public services, was repealed by Acts 1991, No. 1081, § 1. The former section was derived from Acts 1987, No. 978, §§ 1-3. For current law, see § 9-8-102.

Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” twice in (5).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Addam Maxwell v. Lori Maxwell, 2020 Ark. App. 23, 593 S.W.3d 499.
Addam Maxwell v. Lori Maxwell, 2020 Ark. App. 23, 593 S.W.3d 499. · cites it 2× “4 Because Mitch is now eighteen, he does not fall under the statute’s definition of a “child” subject to a custody award, and Addam’s appeal of the court’s order regarding custody of Mitch is moot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.