Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 288 A.2d 872 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 288 A.2d 872 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHEN JAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division.
Mar 15, 1972.
Published opinion
288 A.2d 872
1972 N.J. Super. LEXIS 576
Judges Lewis, Halpern and Lora.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Mr. Denis J. Corbett, Staff Attorney, Ocean County Legal Services, Inc., argued the cause for appellants Norma Jarossy and Stephen Jarossy.

[*522] Mr. Robert S. Fisher, argued the cause for respondent The First National Bank of Toms River.

Mr. Eugene Jume, filed statement in lieu of brief for respondent Conti Causeway Ford.

Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellants in the light of the circumstances of this case, and conclude the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in Judge Robert H. Doherty, Jr.'s opinion below.