Barisa v. Charitable Rsch. Found., Inc., 299 A.2d 430 (Del. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Barisa v. Charitable Rsch. Found., Inc., 299 A.2d 430 (Del. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matrix Group Limited, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company K2, Inc., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees. Matrix Group Limited, Inc., a Florida Corporation With a Principal Place of Business in Safety Harbor, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation With a Principal Place of Business in Fenton, County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee (ca8, 2007-02-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matrix Group Limited, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company K2, Inc., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees. Matrix Group Limited, Inc., a Florida Corporation With a Principal Place of Business in Safety Harbor, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation With a Principal Place of Business in Fenton, County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
8th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Point Boat Corp. v. United States, 267 U.S. 12, 16 , 45 S.Ct. 199 , 69 L.Ed. 490 (1925) (Brandeis, J.); see also Barisa v. Charitable Research Found., Inc., 287 A.2d 679, 682 (Del.Super.Ct.), aff'd, 299 A.2d 430 (Del.1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matrix Group Ltd. v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.
8th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Point Boat Corp. v. United States, 267 U.S. 12, 16 , 45 S.Ct. 199 , 69 L.Ed. 490 (1925) (Brandéis, J.); see also Barisa v. Charitable Research Found., Inc., 287 A.2d 679, 682 (Del.Super.Ct.), aff'd, 299 A.2d 430 (Del.1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. Electrolux Corp.
D. Conn. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Id. at 9-10; see, e.g., Barisa v. Charitable Research Found., Inc., 287 A.2d 679, 682 (Del.Super.), aff'd, 299 A.2d 430 (Del.1972) *1186 (“To require an employer to continue to employ an administrator after the discovery of clandestine arrangements and his admission of surreptitious conduct would be contrary to established principles of law and morality.” (citation omitted)) (interpreting Delaware law).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrence A. BARISA, Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
CHARITABLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, Appellee
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 10, 1972.
299 A.2d 430
Arthur J. Sullivan and Richard P. Beck, of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellant., Joseph T. Walsh, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellee.
Wolcott, Carey, Herrmann.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

In this action for severance pay under an employment contract, the Superior Court granted judgment n. o. v. in favor of the defendant employer. See 287 A.2d 679.

We agree with the conclusions and the reasons therefor stated by the Superior Court.

We find unmeritorious the appellant’s contention that there was a determinative issue of fact for the jury either as to any rule of employment or the motive underlying the employee’s concealment of his misconduct.

Affirmed.