Mcdevitt v. Commonwealth Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Traffic Saf., 458 A.2d 939 (Pa. 1983). · Go Syfert
Mcdevitt v. Commonwealth Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Traffic Saf., 458 A.2d 939 (Pa. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
48 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Scheinert (pa, 1986-12-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Scheinert (4×)
Pa. · 1986 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
participation in ard program shall be considered a conviction for purposes of determining whether a person is a habitual offender under section 1542 of the vehicle code
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. McKiniry
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. McDevitt, 57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 589 , 427 A.2d 280 (1981), aff'd, 500 Pa. 530 , 458 A.2d 939 (1983).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Becker (4×)
Pa. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth, Dept. of Trans. v. McDevitt, 57 Pa.Cmwlth. 589 , 427 A.2d 280 (1981), aff'd 500 Pa. 532 , 458 A.2d 939 (1983) (‘participation in ARD program shall be considered a conviction for purposes of determining whether a person is a habitual offender under Section 1542 of the Vehicle Code’).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hillwig v. Commonwealth (2×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. McDevitt, 57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 589 , 427 A.2d 280 (1981), aff'd per curiam, 500 Pa. 532 , 458 A.2d 939 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patrick A. McDEVITT, Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF TRAFFIC SAFETY.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 27, 1983.
458 A.2d 939
Roberts, C.J., and Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson and Zappala.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (4)

Martin J. King, Newtown, for appellant.

Harold Cramer, Asst. Counsel, Ward T. Williams, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for appellee.

Before ROBERTS, C.J., and NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON and ZAPPALA, JJ.

[*533] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.