City of Middletown v. Local Union No. 1073 of the Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, 471 A.2d 244 (Conn. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
City of Middletown v. Local Union No. 1073 of the Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, 471 A.2d 244 (Conn. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
121 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ulster Savings Bank v. 28 Brynwood Lane, Ltd. (connappct, 2012-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Ulster Savings Bank v. 28 Brynwood Lane, Ltd.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Housing Authority v. Local 1161, Council 4, AFSCME, 1 Conn. App. 154, 157 , 468 A.2d 1251 , cert. denied, 192 Conn. 802 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. Department of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlino v. Danbury Hospital, 1 Conn. App. 142, 145-46 , 468 A.2d 1245 , cert. denied, 192 Conn. 802 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984); see also Regs., Conn. State Agencies § 31-301-8.
discussed Cited "see" 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
This case concerns two private parties and is not a case in which a town brings an action to prevent a claimed illegality from continuing; see Johnson v. Murzyn, 1 Conn. App. 176 , 469 A.2d 1227 , cert. denied, 192 Conn. 802 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984); or one brought against a town’s zoning officials to assert rights of private property owners arising from a claimed illegality allowed to exist by the officials; see Scoville v. Ronalter, 162 Conn. 67 , 291 A.2d 222 (1971); or a case in which the town sought to intervene as a party plaintiff.
cited Cited "see" Harman v. Bench Secs. Corp., No. Cv 95 0534266s (Jan. 22, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arrigoni v. Adorno , 129 Conn. 674 (1943) and Wedig v. Brinster , 1 Conn. App. 123 (1983) cert. denied 192 Conn. 803 (1984).
cited Cited "see" L & R Realty v. Connecticut National Bank
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. Murzyn, 1 Conn. App. 176, 181 , 469 A.2d 1227 , cert. denied, 192 Conn. 902 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Schmitz
Conn. App. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wedig v. Brinster, 1 Conn. App. 123, 135 , 469 A.2d 783 (1983), cert. denied, 192 Conn. 803 , 472 A.2d 1284 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Monroe v. Horwitch
Conn. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Housing Authority v. Local 1161, 1 Conn. App. 154, 157 , 468 A.2d 1251 , cert. denied, 192 Conn. 802 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984).” Christ-Janer v. A. F. Conte & Co., 8 Conn. App. 83, 90 , 511 A.2d 1017 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Lambert v. City of Bridgeport (2×)
Conn. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Middletown v. Local 1073, 1 Conn. App. 58, 62 , 467 A.2d 1258 (1983), cert. dismissed, 192 Conn. 803 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Christ-Janer v. A.F. Conte & Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Housing Authority v. Local 1161, 1 Conn. App. 154, 157, 468 A.2d 1251 , cert. denied, 192 Conn. 802 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McFarland v. Department of Developmental Services (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Nevertheless, despite the lack of such an express prohibition, we must construe statutes “in view of [their] societal purpose in order to obtain a result which is neither incongruous nor irrational.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) *313 Ancona v. Norwalk, 217 Conn. 50, 56 , 584 A.2d 454 (1991); see also Middletown v. Local 1073,1 Conn. App. 58,63, 467 A.2d 1258 (1983), cert. dismissed, 192 Conn. 803 , 471 A.2d 244 (1984). 11 We do not suggest that there are no means by which the defendant could attempt to seek reimbursement. 12 The requested insertions, as set forth in the defendant’…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Town of Haddam v. Lapointe
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rather, our Supreme Court has held that “[t]he grant of jurisdiction to ensure compliance with a statute hardly suggests an absolute duty to do so under any and all circumstances, and a [trial judge] ... is not mechanically obligated to grant an injunction for every violation of law.”(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Conservation Commission v. Price, 193 Conn. 414, 430 , 479 A.2d 187 (1984); see also Gelinas v. West Hartford, 225 Conn 575, 626 A.2d 259 (1993). “[T]he granting of injunctive relief . . . must be compatible with the equities of the case [and] rests within the trial court�…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Middletown
v.
Local Union No. 1073 of the International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 15, 1984.
471 A.2d 244
W. Paul Flynn, in support of the petition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 58, is dismissed.