green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Leandry
See State v. Lo Sacco, 11 Conn. App. 24 , 29–30, 525 A.2d 977 (finding no error in jury charge when judge read statute verbatim, explained each sub- section, and defined key term for jury), cert. denied, 204 Conn. 812 , 528 A.2d 1158 (1987). ‘‘As long as [the instructions] are correct in law, adapted to the issues and sufficient for the guidance of the jury . . . we will not view the instructions as improper.’’ (Internal quota- tion marks omitted.) State v. Kitchens, supra, 299 Conn. 455 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Banta
See State v. Lo Sacco, 11 Conn. App. 24, 27 , 525 A.2d 977 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 812 , 528 A.2d 1158 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniel B.
The court’s instructions mirrored the language of the statute.16 See General Statutes § 53a-49 (a); see also State v. Lo Sacco, 11 Conn. App. 24 , 29–30, 525 A.2d 977 (finding no error in jury charge when judge read statute verbatim), cert. denied, 204 Conn. 812 , 528 A.2d 1158 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Frank X. Lo Sacco
v.
Frank X. Lo Sacco
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 23, 1987.
Frank X. Lo Sacco, pro se, in support of the petition., Susann E. Gill, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 11 Conn. App. 24, is denied.