State v. Martin, 548 A.2d 440 (Conn. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Martin, 548 A.2d 440 (Conn. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Amity Partners v. Woodbridge Associates, L.P. (connappct, 2020-07-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Amity Partners v. Woodbridge Associates, L.P.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central National Bank of New York v. Bernstein, 15 Conn. App. 90, 92 , 544 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 806 , 548 A.2d 436 (1988).
cited Cited "see" State v. White
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Iovieno, 14 Conn. App. 710, 726 , 543 A.2d 766 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 805 , 548 A.2d 440 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hall (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Ostroski, supra, 558-59 ; State v. McIntosh, supra, 159 ; see also State v. Martin, 15 Conn. App. 58, 65 , 544 A.2d 231 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 806 , 548 A.2d 440 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Stephen J. Martin
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 1988.
548 A.2d 440
John J. Carta, Jr., in support of the petition., Eileen McCarthy Geel, certified legal intern, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 15 Conn. App. 58, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court err in refusing to review the defendant’s claim that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury as requested on the ‘lesser included’ offense of operating a motor vehicle when the defendant’s ability to do so was impaired as provided in Connecticut General Statutes Section 14-227a (b)?

“Did the Appellate Court err in finding no error on the trial court’s charge on the credibility of witnesses?”