Bartholomew v. Foster, 563 A.2d 1390 (Pa. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Bartholomew v. Foster, 563 A.2d 1390 (Pa. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Weaver v. Harpster (pa, 2009-07-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Weaver v. Harpster (4×)
Pa. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bartholomeiv on Behalf of Bartholomew v. Foster, 115 Pa.Cmwlth. 430 , 541 A.2d 393, 397 (1988), affd per curiam 522 Pa. 489 , 563 A.2d 1390 (1989). 14 We have not hesitated to effectuate the Equal Rights Amendment’s prohibition of sex discrimination by striking down statutes and common law doctrines predicated upon traditional or stereotypical roles of men and women.
discussed Cited "see" Imboden v. Chowns Communications (2×)
E.D. Pa. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bartholomew v. Foster, 115 Pa.Cmwlth. 430 , 541 A.2d 393, 396 (1988), aff'd, 522 Pa. 489 , 563 A.2d 1390 (1989); Welsch v. Aetna Ins.
examined Cited "see" Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (4×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bartholomew v. Foster, 115 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 430 , 541 A.2d 393 (1988), affirmed, 522 Pa. 489 , 563 A.2d 1390 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ann and Craig BARTHOLOMEW, on Behalf of their son, Jonathan BARTHOLOMEW, and the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania, on behalf of its members
v.
Constance B. FOSTER, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Appeals of The INSURANCE FEDERATION OF PA., INC., Intervenor at No. 17; Anne Grahn, Intervenor at No. 18; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Intervenor at No. 19; Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor at No. 20; and Erie Insurance Group, Intervenor at No. 21.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 3, 1989.
563 A.2d 1390
Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos and Stout.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

[*490] Jeffrey A. Less, A. Richard Feldman, James J. McCabe, Jr., Jane L. Dalton, Philadelphia, H. Lee Roussel, Harrisburg, Richard DiSalle, Susan Hileman, and Kim D. Eaton, Pittsburgh, for appellants.

David F. Snyder, Harrisburg, for American Ins. Assn., amicus curiae in support of appellant at all Nos.

Jordan Lorence, Cimron Campbell, Washington, D.C., and James N. Clymer, Lancaster, for Concerned Women for America, amicus curiae in support of appellant at all Nos.

John G. Knorr, III and Calvin Koons, Harrisburg, for Constance B. Foster at all Nos.

Stefen Presser, Philadelphia, Deborah A. Ellis, and Rita Bernstein, Philadelphia, for Ann and Craig Bartholomew, et al. at all Nos.

Paul McHale, Bethlehem, for Pa. House of Rep., amicus curiae in support of appellee at all Nos.

Patricia A. Rodgers, Greensburg, for Pa. Fed. of Business & Prof. Women's Clubs, Inc., amicus curiae in support of appellee at all Nos.

John S. Summers, Philadelphia, for American Assn. of Univ. Women, amicus curiae in support of appellee at all Nos.

Alaine S. Williams, Philadelphia, for Pa. AFL-CIO, amicus curiae in support of appellee at all Nos.

Seth F. Kreimer and Jeffrey Ivan Pasek, Philadelphia, for American Jewish Congress of Phila., for amicus curiae in support of appellee at all Nos.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

[*491] STOUT, former J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 1989, the Application for Reargument is denied.

ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent and would grant reargument.