green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tompkins v. Freedom of Information Commission
See Board of Pardons v. Freedom of Information Commission, 19 Conn. App. 539, 546 , 563 A.2d 314 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 819 , 565 A.2d 539 (1989); see also General Statutes § 4-166 et seq. “[W]here aparty appeals pursuant to the jurisdictional grant of the UAPA, the agency action is measured by the standards contained within the UAPA. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dixon
(2×)
Indeed, that is precisely why the rules of practice contemplate that the report accompany the defendant into the correctional system; see Board of Pardons v. Freedom of Information Commission, 19 Conn.App. 539, 543 , 563 A.2d 314 (board of pardons considers report, along with all other information, in determining whether to issue pardon), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 819 , 565 A.2d 539 (1989); and specifically why the court in this case declined to amend the report.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salce v. Wolczek
See, e.g., Chomko v. Patmon, 19 Conn. App. 483 , 484 n.1, 563 A.2d 311 (‘‘[a] [b]ond for [d]eed . . . is an installment sale contract of real property where the buyer takes possession of the property but does not receive fee simple title of the property until a later date’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 819 , 565 A.2d 539 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Board of Pardons
v.
Freedom of Information Commission
v.
Freedom of Information Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 12, 1989.
Victor R. Perpetua, commission counsel, in support of the petition., Henri Alexandre, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The defendant Freedom of Information Commission’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 539, is denied.