green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McCoy v. Commissioner of Public Safety
(2×)
See State v. Brown, 22 Conn.App. 108, 111 , 575 A.2d 699 (citing Kluttz ), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990); State v. Trahan, 45 Conn.App. 722, 733 , 697 A.2d 1153 (citing portion of Brown that had cited Kluttz ), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 924 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Trahan
See State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 111 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nova
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Gainey, 116 Conn. App. 710 , 722–23, 977 A.2d 257 (2009). ‘‘[I]t is well settled that if the contraband is found in a place where the defendant does not have exclusive possession, the presence of the defendant near the con- traband without more is insufficient to support an infer- ence of possession.’’ State v. Brunori, 22 Conn. App. 431, 436 , 578 A.2d 139 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 814 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990). ‘‘To mitigate the possibility that innocent persons might be prosecuted for . . . possessory offenses . . . it is essential that the state’s evidence in…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lewis
(4×)
General Statutes § 21a-267 (a) (“[n]o person shall . . . possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia” [emphasis added]); General Statutes § 21a-267 (c) (same); see also State v. Brunori, 22 Conn. App. 431, 435 , 578 A.2d 139 (under § 21a-267 [a], state must prove defendant possessed drug paraphernalia with intent to use it), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 814 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Berger
(2×)
“Where, as here, the cocaine was not found on the defendant’s person, the state must proceed on the theory of constructive possession, that is, possession without direct physical contact.” State v. Elijah, 42 Conn. App. 687, 698 , 682 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 936 , 684 A.2d 709 (1996); see also State v. Brunori, 22 Conn. App. 431, 436 , 578 A.2d 139 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 814 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990); State v. Santiago, 17 Conn. App. 273, 278 , 552 A.2d 438 (1989); State v. Melillo, 17 Conn. App. 114, 117-18 , 550 A.2d 319 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gilbert
(2×)
State v. Frazier, 39 Conn. App. 369, 378-79 , 665 A.2d 142 (1995).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Thompson, 46 Conn. App. 791, 797-98 , 700 A.2d 1198 (1997); see also State v. Brunori, 22 Conn. App. 431, 435-36 , 578 A.2d 139 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 814 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Forde
(2×)
State v. Alfonso, 195 Conn. 624, 633 , 490 A.2d 75 (1985); see also State v. Brunori, 22 Conn. App. 431, 435-36 , 578 A.2d 139 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 814 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harrison
See, e.g., id., 202 (motor vehicle violation is a crime for purposes of qualifying for drug treatment program); State v. Dukes, 209 Conn. 98, 122 , 547 A.2d 10 (1988) (motor vehicle violation is a crime for purposes of a reasonable search of occupant of stopped vehicle); see also State v. Brown, 22 Conn. App. 108, 112 , 575 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 811 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990) (motor vehicle violation is a violation of criminal laws for purposes of determining whether condition of probation has been violated); State v. Kluttz, 9 Conn. App. 686, 698-700 , 521 A.2d 178 (1987) (negligent ho…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ober
(2×)
To establish possession, the state must show beyond a reasonable doubt that “the defendant knew the character of the substance, knew of its presence and exercised dominion and control over it.” State v. Alfonso, 195 Conn. 624, 633 , 490 A.2d 75 (1985); see also State v. Brunori, 22 Conn. App. 431, 435-36 , 578 A.2d 139 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 814 , 580 A.2d 61 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Roger Brunori
v.
Roger Brunori
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 1990.
Paul Ferencek, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.
Published
The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 431, is denied.