green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Vega
State v. Sinclair, 197 Conn. 574, 582 , 500 A.2d 539 (1985); see State v. Tatem, supra, 194 Conn. 595 .” 6 State v. Yurch, supra, 229 Conn. 521 ; State v. Suplicki, 33 Conn. App. 126, 128-29 , 634 A.2d 1179 (1993); but see State v. Reid, 22 Conn. App. 321, 327 , 577 A.2d 1073 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 207 (1990) (departure from language of § 54-84 (b) so minor — substitution of “adverse” for “unfavorable” — that deviation “not improper”).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See State v. Reid, 22 Conn. App. 321, 324 , 577 A.2d 1073 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 207 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Clement v. Clement
See Cabrera v. Cabrera, 23 Conn. App. 330, 348-49 , 580 A.2d 1227 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Annessa J.
As we have previously noted, ‘‘this court has never required the talismanic recital of specific words or phrases if a review of the entire record sup- ports the conclusion that the trial court properly applied the law.’’ State v. Henderson, 312 Conn. 585 , 597, 94 A.3d 614 (2014); see, e.g., State v. Reid, 22 Conn. App. 321 , 326–27, 577 A.2d 1073 (determining that trial court’s charge to jury was not defective, despite fact that court substituted word ‘‘adverse’’ for ‘‘unfavorable’’ in statute, ‘‘because the terms are synonymous and such a substi- tution does n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coleman v. Bembridge
Id.; see also Cabrera v. Cabrera, 23 Conn. App. 330 , 346–47, 580 A.2d 1227 (citing Emerick in concluding that trial court properly determined that it could not grant joint custody without agreement of parties to joint custody or motion for conciliation following motion for joint custody by one party), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kyle S. v. Jayne K.
See also Cabrera v. Cabrera , 23 Conn. App. 330 , 335, 580 A.2d 1227 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 205 (1990) ; see generally In re Jacklyn H. , 162 Conn. App. 811 , 824, 826, 131 A.3d 784 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kemler
Id., 387-88; see also State v. Reid, 22 Conn. App. 321, 324-25 , 577 A.2d 1073 (because jury did not ask for reinstruction or evince confusion on elements of self-defense, trial court had no duty to reinstruct on that defense), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 207 (1990). 3 We reiterate that the jury had a copy of the information during its deliberations.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kinsella v. Kinsella
See, e.g., Cabrera, supra, 580 A.2d at 1233 (holding, in custody case, that party seeking admission of testimony subject to psychologist-patient privilege had not met statutory burden to persuade court that justice required admission), certif. denied, 216 Conn. 828 , 582 A.2d 205 (1990); Mass. Gen.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Home Insurance Company
v.
Aetna Life and Casualty Company
v.
Aetna Life and Casualty Company
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 2, 1990.
William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition., Lois B. Tanzer and Edward W. Case, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is denied.