green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Porter
See Beinhorn v. Saraceno, 23 Conn. App. 487, 491 , 582 A.2d 208 (1990), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1233 (1991). ‘‘Because probable cause to arrest constitutes justification, there can be no claim for false arrest where the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff.’’ Escalera v. Lunn, 361 F.3d 737, 743 (2d Cir. 2004). ‘‘Probable cause, broadly defined, comprises such facts as would reasonably persuade an impartial and reason- able mind not merely to suspect or conjecture, but to believe that criminal activity has occurred. . . .
cited
Cited "see"
Reese v. Garcia
See Beinhorn v. Saraceno, 23 Conn.App. 487 , 582 A.2d 208 (1990), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1233 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Colonial Homes, Inc., No. Cv94 0141946 (Nov. 13, 1997)
(2×)
See Dorsey v. Mancuso, 23 Conn. App. 629 , 583 A.2d 646 (1990), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1234 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Francis
See State v. Murdick, 23 Conn. App. 692, 702-703 , 583 A.2d 1318 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1233 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Murdick, 23 Conn. App. 692, 702 , 583 A.2d 1318 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1233 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. MARCELINO S.
Ed. 2d 312 (1989); see also State v. Hickey, 23 Conn. App. 712, 715 , 584 A.2d 473 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1233 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1252 , 111 S. Ct. 2894 , 115 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gamlestaden Plc v. Backstrom, No. Cv93 0130060 S (May 17, 1995)
Frederick Scholes Agency v. Mitchell, 191 Conn. 353 , 358 , 464 A.2d 795 (1983); see also Dorsey v. Mancuso, 23 Conn. App. 629 , 633 , 583 A.2d 811 (1990), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1191 (1991); Miller v. Appleby, 183 Conn. 51 , 54-55 , 438 A.2d 811 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Champagne v. Gintick
An officer has probable cause to arrest when “the [officer] ha[s] knowledge or reasonably trustworthy information of facts and circumstances that are sufficient in themselves to warrant a person of reasonable caution in the belief that (1) an offense has been or is being committed (2) by the person to be arrested.” United States v. Ceballos, 812 F.2d 42, 50 (2d Cir.1987) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Beinhorn v. Saraceno, 23 Conn.App. 487, 492 , 582 A.2d 208 , certif. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1233 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kim Dorsey
v.
Jack C. Mancuso
v.
Jack C. Mancuso
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 7, 1991.
William L. Ankerman, in support of the petition., Norman F. Fishbein and Kim Dorsey, pro se, in opposition.
Cited by 14 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 629, is denied.