State v. Angelo, 597 A.2d 335 (Conn. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Angelo, 597 A.2d 335 (Conn. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rios (connappct, 2008-09-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rios
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. James, 93 Conn. App. 51 , 57 n.6, 887 A.2d 923 (2006). 5 In State v. Angelo, 25 Conn. App. 235, 239-40 , 594 A.2d 24 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991), this court held that the state does not have a right to appeal immediately from the decision of a trial court granting a defendant's application for accelerated rehabilitation.
cited Cited "see" Simms v. Simms
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Simms v. Simms, 25 Conn. App. 231, 235, 593 A.2d 161 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" Board of Police Commissioners v. Stanley
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Angelo, 25 Conn. App. 235, 239-40 , 594 A.2d 24 (finding that motion to grant accelerated rehabilitation is not final judgment for purposes of appeal and that right of appeal does not ripen until charges dismissed), cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991); see also State v. Trahan, 45 Conn. App. 722, 732 , 697 A.2d 1153 (“only right that the defendant may earn under the accelerated rehabilitation statute is the right to a dismissal of the charges against him, a right that is expressly conditioned on satisfactory completion of the period of probation” [internal quotat…
cited Cited "see" Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Protter v. Brown Thompson & Co., 25 Conn. App. 360, 363 , 593 A.2d 524 , cert. granted, 220 Conn. 910 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991) (appeal withdrawn).
cited Cited "see" Muller v. Muller
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Simms v. Simms, 25 Conn. App. 231 , 593 A.2d 161 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Neron
Conn. App. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Spendolini, 189 Conn. 92, 95 , 454 A.2d 720 (1983).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Angelo, 25 Conn. App. 235, 239 , 594 A.2d 24 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Greg D., (Nov. 6, 1997)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Angelo , 25 Conn. App. 235 , 241 , 594 A.2d 24 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Greg D., (Oct. 16, 1997)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Angelo, 25 Conn. App. 235 , 241 , 594 A.2d 24 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Antone Angelo
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 19, 1991.
597 A.2d 335
Mark D. Malley and Wesley W. Horton, in support of the petition., Susan C. Marks, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 235, is denied.