State v. Indrisano, 617 A.2d 168 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Indrisano, 617 A.2d 168 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Torres (connappct, 1993-05-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Torres
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miller, 29 Conn. App. 207 , 614 A.2d 1229 , cert. granted, 224 Conn. 914 , 915, 617 A.2d 170 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. DeFusco
Conn. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Oquendo, supra, 650-52 (“seizure” under article first, §§ 7 and 9); State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 538 n.4, 594 A.2d 917 (1991) (“probable cause” under article first, § 7); see also, e.g., State v. Miller, 29 Conn. App. 207, 217-19 , 614 A.2d 1229 , cert. granted, 224 Conn. 914 , 915, 614 A.2d 170 (1992) (warrant requirement under article first, § 7); the arguments of both the defendant and the state emphasized the discussion of what Connecticut citizens would consider reasonable in the present day.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Albert Indrisano
SC 14631.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 30, 1992.
617 A.2d 168
Sally S. King, in support of the petition., Rita M. Shair, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 283 (AC 10659), is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the record was insufficient, pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 (1989), to permit adequate appellate review of the defendant’s claims that, on its face and as applied, General Statutes § 53a-182 was void for vagueness under the state and federal constitutions?

“2. Is General Statutes § 53a-182 void for vagueness on its face and as applied to this case, under the state and federal constitutions?”