State v. Young, 621 A.2d 287 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Young, 621 A.2d 287 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Wallace (conn, 2009-02-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Wallace
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Young, 29 Conn. App. 754, 761-62 , 618 A.2d 65 (1992) (“[a]bsent a request by the jury seeking further instruction on the concept of self-defense or justification, or clear indication evincing confusion on the law relating to that defense, the defendant’s constitutional rights are not abridged by the failure to reinstruct on the defense”), cert. denied, 225 Conn. 904 , 621 A.2d 287 (1993); see also State v. Kemler, *278 106 Conn. App. 359 , 364 n.2, 942 A.2d 480 (absent request or confusion, trial court not required to broaden scope of jury’s inquiry), cert. denied, 286 Co…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kemler
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Young, 29 Conn. App. 754, 760-62 , 618 A.2d 65 (1992) (claim that court improperly failed to reinstruct jury on theory of self-defense not of constitutional magnitude where no evidence of jury confusion about instruction on self- *364 defense and jury did not request reinstruction on self-defense), cert. denied, 225 Conn. 904 , 621 A.2d 287 (1993). 2 The defendant also seeks review pursuant to the plain error doctrine.
cited Cited "see" State v. Batista
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Young, 29 Conn. App. 754, 766 , 618 A.2d 65 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 904 , 621 A.2d 287 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Coleman
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2); see State v. Maxwell, 29 Conn. App. 704, 711-12 , 618 A.2d 43 (1992), cert. denied, 225 Conn. 904 , 621 A.2d 287 , cert. denied, 509 U.S. 930 , 113 S. Ct. 3057 , 125 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Elsey
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
B The defendant seeks review of the second and third statements under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). “[W]e have long held that [Golding] review of such a claim is unavailable where the claimed misconduct was not blatantly egregious and merely consisted of isolated and brief episodes that did not reveal a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial.” State v. Somerville, 214 Conn. 378, 393 , 572 A.2d 944 (1990); see State v. Rogers, 50 Conn. App. 467, 477 , 718 A.2d 985 (“ ‘[w]e will not afford Golding review to [unpreserved] claims of prosecutorial …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
James Willey Young
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 11, 1993.
621 A.2d 287
Denise M. Cloutier and Robert S. Melvin, special public defenders, in support of the petition., Lawrence J. Tytla, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 754 (AC 10278), is denied.