State v. Hamilton, 621 A.2d 290 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hamilton, 621 A.2d 290 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
William Hamilton, Jr.
SC 14704.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 24, 1993.
Published opinion
621 A.2d 290
1993 Conn. LEXIS 90
Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 68 (AC 10692), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly commingle direct appeal and collateral review standards and thereby arrive at the erroneous and harmful legal conclusion that in order to prevail on a direct appeal claim that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a continuance to obtain new counsel, the defendant must demonstrate ‘specific prejudice’ or claim ‘ineffective assistance of counsel’?”