Tovish v. Gerber Elec., 632 A.2d 707 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Tovish v. Gerber Elec., 632 A.2d 707 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Frech v. Piontkowski (conn, 2010-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Frech v. Piontkowski
Conn. · 2010 · confidence medium
Id., 755-56.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Stefanoni v. Duncan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · confidence medium
The court concluded that “the placement of the docks significantly burdens the plaintiffs use of the water bordering her property, thereby interfering with her littoral rights.” Id., 758.
cited Cited "see" Walters v. Servidio
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCul- lough v. Waterfront Park Assn., Inc., 32 Conn. App. 746, 749 , 630 A.2d 1372 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 933 , 632 A.2d 707 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough v. Waterfront Park Assn., Inc., 32 Conn. App. 746 , 630 A.2d 1372 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 933 , 632 A.2d 707 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boyne v. Town of Glastonbury
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Roy v. Moore, 85 Conn. 159, 166 , 82 A. 233 (1912) (function of injunction is to afford preventive relief, not to redress alleged wrongs committed already); see also McCullough v. Waterfront Park Assn., Inc., 32 Conn. App. 746, 749 , 630 A.2d 1372 (although plaintiff held title to subj ect property, plaintiff not entitled to injunctive relief when she did not prove exclusive possession), cert. denied, 227 Conn. 933 , 632 A.2d 707 (1993); 1 Restatement (Second), supra, § 162, comment (d); 42 Am.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maureen C. Tovish
v.
Gerber Electronics
SC 14848.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 5, 1993.
632 A.2d 707
Scott Wilson Williams, in support of the petition., Robert R. Sheldon, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 595 (AC 11484), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in deciding that scope of employment under General Statutes § 31-275 includes a domestic preparatory activity where the commissioner had concluded that the sole reason the decedent was shoveling snow in his driveway was to enable him to exit his driveway to visit customers?”
[*931] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14848. Decided October 5, 1993 Scott Wilson Williams, in support of the petition. Robert R. Sheldon, in opposition.