Middlesex Mut. Assurance Co. v. Clinton, 666 A.2d 1186 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Middlesex Mut. Assurance Co. v. Clinton, 666 A.2d 1186 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
82 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Evanston Insurance Co. v. William Kramer & Associates, LLC. (ca2, 2018-05-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Evanston Insurance Co. v. William Kramer & Associates, LLC.
2d Cir. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 300 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995); see also Lombard v. Edward J.
discussed Cited "see" Neuhaus v. DeCholnoky
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 305 , 664 A.2d 803 (§ 52-584 “reflects a policy of law, as declared by the legislature, that after a given length of time a [defendant] should be sheltered from liability and furthers the public policy of allowing people, after the lapse of a reasonable time, to plan their affairs with a degree of certainty, free from the disruptive burden of protracted and unknown potential liability” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Rosenfield v. Rogin, Nassau, Caplan, Lassman & Hirtle, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 301-302 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Nosik v. Mastronardi, No. Cv00 37 90 88 S (Mar. 11, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289 , 297 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Home Loan Investment Bank v. Sebjan, No. Cv97 032 96 03 S (Jul. 24, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
"The continuing course of conduct doctrine reflects the policy that, during an ongoing relationship, lawsuits are premature because specific tortious acts or omissions may be difficult to identify and may yet be remedied." Blanchette v. Barrett , supra, 229 Conn. 276 ; see Sanborn v. Greenwald , 39 Conn. App. 289 , 295 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995). "[A] precondition for the operation of the continuing course of conduct doctrine is that the defendant must have committed an initial wrong upon the plaintiff." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , supra, 204.
cited Cited "see" Rosenfield v. Rogin, No. Cv 97 0568522 (Apr. 12, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289 , 301 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Grenier
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Although it is the general rule that a party who induces error cannot be heard to complain about such error; see State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 (1995); unpreserved claims of constitutional magnitude, even when induced by the appellant, may be reviewed pursuant to Golding .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Courchesne (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
E.g., State v. Griffin, 251 Conn. 671, 692-94 , 741 A.2d 913 (1999) (setting forth common-law rights with respect to jury trials as enumerated by Swift); Binette v. Sabo, 244 Conn. 23, 78 , 710 A.2d 688 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (relying on Swift to establish importance of individual rights, including right to be free from abuse of governmental power, during preconstitutional era); Weidenbacher v. Duclos, 234 Conn. 51, 60-61 , 661 A.2d 988 (1995) (relying on Swift in concluding that writ of habeas corpus is proper procedural vehicle with which to challenge c…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Decorso v. Watchtower Bible, No. Cv 98 145296 (Mar. 10, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Thus, the three year limitation period of § 52-577 applies to all actions based on a tort unless there has *394 been a specific statutory exclusion.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Rubin, 209 Conn. 437, 441 , 551 A.2d 1220 (1988); see, e.g., Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 301 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995) (noting that actions for legal malpractice based on negligence are subject to § 52-577).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Decorso v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sanborn v. Greenwald , 39 Conn. App. 289 , 301 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995) (noting that actions for legal malpractice based on negligence are subject to § 52-577 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY
v.
EDWARD CLINTON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 1995.
666 A.2d 1186
Judith Clinton, pro se, in support of the petition., Joel J. Rottner and Jonathan Kline, in opposition.
Published

The defendant Judith Clinton’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 555 (AC 13428), is denied.