green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hickey v. Commissioner of Correction
See Practice Book § 60-5. ‘‘[T]he failure of the trial court to give a limiting instruction concerning the use of evi- dence of prior misconduct is not a matter of constitu- tional magnitude.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 381 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Atkins
See Practice Book § 60-5. “[T]he failure of the trial court to give a limiting instruction concerning the use of evidence of prior misconduct is not a matter of constitutional magnitude.” *535 (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 381 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 380 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert, denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
State v. Williams, 203 Conn. 159, 185 , 523 A.2d 1284 (1987); see State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 378 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert, denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Green
State v. Williams, 203 Conn. 159, 185 , 523 A.2d 1284 (1987); see State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 378 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert, denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Greene
State v. Williams, 203 Conn. 159, 185 , 523 A.2d 1284 (1987); see State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 378 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perez
State v. Theriault, 38 Conn. App. 815, 823 , 663 A.2d 423 (prior conviction admitted for credibility purposes), cert, denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1188 (1995) , citing State v. Walton, supra, 227 Conn. 64 -65; see also State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 381 , 671 A.2d 389 (failure to give limiting instruction concerning use of evidence of prior misconduct is not of constitutional magnitude), cert, denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gibson
See, e.g., State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 380-81 , 671 A.2d 389 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916 , 673 A.2d 1144 (1996); State v. Servello, 14 Conn. App. 88, 94-95 , 540 A.2d 378 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 811 , 545 A.2d 1107 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RIMIKO CAFFE
v.
BENEDICT CAFFE
v.
BENEDICT CAFFE
SC 15400.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 8, 1996.
Barbara L. Cox, in support of the petition., Gary Oberst and Joshua Kammerman, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 178 (AC 12819), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this dissolution of marriage case, did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court as to financial matters on the ground that the trial court did not refer to the statutes governing such matters?”