Discuillo v. Stone, 684 A.2d 711 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Discuillo v. Stone, 684 A.2d 711 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (54 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vaillancourt v. Latifi (connappct, 2004-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Vaillancourt v. Latifi
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn. App. 265, 270 , 682 A.2d 148 , cert. denied, 239 A.2d 942 , 684 A.2d 711 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Arigno v. Murzin, No. Cv-96-0474102-S (Oct. 2, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn. App. 265 , 275-276 , 682 A.2d 148 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942 , 684 A.2d 711 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Raph v. Vogeler
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn. App. 265, 280 , 682 A.2d 148 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942 , 684 A.2d 711 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carter v. Bowler
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
This court previously has held that ‘‘a grievance proceeding is quasi-judicial in nature’’; Cohen v. King, 189 Conn. App. 85, 90 , 206 A.3d 188 (2019), cert. denied, 336 Conn. 925 , 246 A.3d 986 (2021); and that ‘‘statements made in a grievance proceeding [are] shielded by absolute immu- nity . . . .’’ Id., 92; see also Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn. App. 265, 273 , 682 A.2d 148 (‘‘we conclude that bar grievance proceedings are quasi-judicial’’), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942 , 684 A.2d 711 (1996); Grant v. Quinn, Docket No. CV-XX-XXXXXXX, 2011 WL 925441 , *4 (Conn. Super.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tocco
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc., 43 Conn. App. 161, 163 , 681 A.2d 1011 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 941 , 684 A.2d 712 (1996), and cases cited therein. 9 Ill Finally, the defendant claims that the court improperly permitted the state to present testimony from a witness, M, under the common scheme exception to the general prohibition of prior misconduct evidence.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mann v. Regan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 12 ; see also Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc., 43 Conn. App. 161, 165 , 681 A.2d 1011 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 941 , 684 A.2d 712 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PETER DISCUILLO
v.
STONE AND WEBSTER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 7, 1996.
684 A.2d 711
Amy M. Stone, in support of the petition., Lucas D. Strunk, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 224 (AC 14863), is denied.