green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tocco
See, e.g., Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc., 43 Conn. App. 161, 163 , 681 A.2d 1011 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 941 , 684 A.2d 712 (1996), and cases cited therein. 9 Ill Finally, the defendant claims that the court improperly permitted the state to present testimony from a witness, M, under the common scheme exception to the general prohibition of prior misconduct evidence.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mann v. Regan
Id., 12 ; see also Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc., 43 Conn. App. 161, 165 , 681 A.2d 1011 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 941 , 684 A.2d 712 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS
v.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION STATE BOARD OF MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
v.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION STATE BOARD OF MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
SC 15565.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 7, 1996.
Mitchell W. Pearlman, general counsel, and Victor Perpetua, appellate attorney, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 133 (AC 14410/14411), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that grievance arbitration proceedings before the state board of mediation and arbitration are not ‘meetings’ within the meaning of General Statutes § l-18a (b)?”