State v. Piorkowski, 686 A.2d 122 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Piorkowski, 686 A.2d 122 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sosa v. Robinson (connappct, 2020-09-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sosa v. Robinson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Kiser, 43 Conn. App. 339 , 353–54, 683 A.2d 1021 (declining to review defendant’s state constitu- tional claim because she failed to provide analysis separate from her federal constitutional claim), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 945 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996); see also State v. Stanley, 161 Conn. App. 10 , 23 n.13, 125 A.3d 1078 (2015) (same), cert. denied, 320 Conn. 918 , 131 A.3d 1154 (2016).
discussed Cited "see" Weinshel, Wynnick & Associates, LLC v. Bongiorno
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Outlaw v. Meriden, 43 Conn. App. 387, 390 , 682 A.2d 1112 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996). 12 Accordingly, we note that the court incorrectly applied the six month time limitation to this action.
cited Cited "see" Christie Marceau v. City of Norwich Et Al.
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Outlaw v. Meriden, 43 Conn. App. 387, 395 , 682 A.2d 1112 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Marceau v. Norwich
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Outlaw v. Meriden, 43 Conn. App. 387 , 395 , 682 A.2d 1112 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Rosenblit v. City of Hartford, No. Cv98-0492315 (Mar. 8, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Given the fact that the valuation of real estate is not an exact science; see MacLean v. Town of Darien , 43 Conn. App. 169 , 173 , 682 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 943 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996); we do not find the difference to be significant enough to upset the valuation of the subject property by the city as of October 1, 1989.
cited Cited "see" Pinnacle Realty, LLC v. City of Hartford, No. Cv95-0550585 (Jun. 23, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See MacLean v. Town of Darien , 43 Conn. App. 169 , 174 , 682 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 943 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Binette v. Sabo
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
“False imprisonment, or false arrest, is the unlawful restraint by one person of the physical liberty of another.” Green v. Donroe, 186 Conn. 265, 267 , 440 A.2d 973 (1982); see Outlaw v. Meriden, 43 Conn. App. 387, 392 , 682 A.2d 1112 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Myers (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Also indicative of the defendant's intent to sell narcotics is the manner in which the narcotics are packaged." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ogrinc, 29 Conn.App. 694, 699 , 617 A.2d 924 (1992); see also State v. Kiser, 43 Conn.App. 339, 344 , 683 A.2d 1021 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 945 , 686 A.2d 122 (1996), (individually wrapped packages of cocaine consistent with preparation of drugs for sale), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1190 , 117 S.Ct. 1478 , 137 L.Ed.2d 690 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MICHAEL PIORKOWSKI
SC 15572.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 20, 1996.
686 A.2d 122
Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, and Joseph G. Bruckmann, public defender, in support of the petition., Judith Rossi, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 209 (AC 13537), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution, the defendant’s waiver of counsel regarding his October 22, 1992 statement was not rendered invalid by the fact that the waiver was made without the presence of counsel?”