Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Driscoll, 697 A.2d 82 (Md. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Driscoll, 697 A.2d 82 (Md. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ak's Daks Communications, Inc. v. Maryland Securities Division (mdctspecapp, 2001-04-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Ak's Daks Communications, Inc. v. Maryland Securities Division
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Young v. Board of Physician Quality Assurance, 111 Md.App. 721, 726 , 684 A.2d 17 (1996), cert. granted, 344 Md. 568 , 688 A.2d 447 , cert. dismissed, 346 Md. 314 , 697 A.2d 82 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Peter DRISCOLL
Misc. Docket AG, No. 5.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jul 24, 1997.
697 A.2d 82
Eldridge.
Published

ORDER

JOHN C. ELDRIDGE, Senior Judge.

The Court having considered the joint petition for reprimand by consent of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and respondent, Peter Driscoll, to reprimand the respondent, it is this 24th day of July, 1997,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Peter Driscoll, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded, and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent shall pay costs in the amount of $417.00 for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Peter Driscoll.