green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Han
The only right that the defendant acquires by the granting of a motion for accelerated rehabilitation is the right to a dismissal of the underlying criminal charge if the defen- dant satisfactorily completes the period of pretrial pro- bation imposed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fanning, 98 Conn. App. 111, 115 , 908 A.2d 573 (2006), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 904 , 916 A.2d 46 (2007). ‘‘If the defendant refuses to accept, or, having accepted, violates such conditions [as the court shall order], the defendant’s case shall be brought to trial.’’ General Stat- utes �…
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC
See Castonguay v. Plourde , 46 Conn. App. 251 , 268-69, 699 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 931 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hous. Auth. of the Town of Greenwich v. Rodriguez
See State v. Hilton , 45 Conn. App. 207 , 222, 694 A.2d 830 ("[w]e are not bound to consider claims of law not properly raised at trial"), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 925 , 701 A.2d 659 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1134 , 118 S.Ct. 1091 , 140 L.Ed.2d 147 (1998). 24 C.F.R. § 966.54 (2014) provides: "Any grievance shall be personally presented, either orally or in writing, to the [public housing authority] office or to the office of the project in which the complainant resides so that the grievance may be discussed informally and settled without a hearing.
cited
Cited "see"
Prime Locations of CT, LLC v. Rocky Hill Development, LLC
See generally, Castonguay v. Plourde, 46 Conn.App. 251 , 260, 699 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 931 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hyde Road Development, LLC v. Pumpkin Associates, LLC
See Castonguay v. Plourde, 46 Conn. App. 251, 261 , 699 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 931 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Llera
See State v. Hilton, 45 Conn. App. 207, 219-20 , 694 A.2d 830 (jmy instruction mitigates prejudicial impact of evidence), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 925 , 701 A.2d 659 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1134 , 118 S. Ct. 1091 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Calabrese v. McHugh
See Castonguay v. Plourde, 46 Conn.App. 251, 258 , 699 A.2d 226, 232 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 931 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997); Braithwaite, 1991 WL 126464 , at *7.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jerzy G.
See, e.g., State v. Fanning , supra, at 120 , 908 A.2d 573 ; see State v. Kevalis , supra, 313 Conn. at 600-601 , 99 A.3d 196 ; see also State v. Trahan , 45 Conn. App. 722 , 732, 697 A.2d 1153 (''[i]f the trial court determines that the defendant did not fulfill the conditions of probation, the charges will not be dismissed and the defendant may be required to go to trial'' [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 924 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Asia A.M. v. Geoffrey M.
(2×)
We will not promote a Kafkaesque academic test by which [a trial judge] may be determined on appeal to have failed because of questions never asked of [him] or issues never clearly presented to [him].’’ [Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.]); see also State v. Hilton, 45 Conn. App. 207, 222 , 694 A.2d 830 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 925 , 701 A.2d 659 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1134 , 118 S. Ct. 1091 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cirinna v. Kosciuszkiewicz
See, e.g., State v. Hilton, 45 Conn. App. 207 , 208 n.2, 694 A.2d 830 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 925 , 701 A.2d 659 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1134 , 118 S. Ct. 1091 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Police Commissioners v. Stanley
See State v. Angelo, 25 Conn. App. 235, 239-40 , 594 A.2d 24 (finding that motion to grant accelerated rehabilitation is not final judgment for purposes of appeal and that right of appeal does not ripen until charges dismissed), cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 335 (1991); see also State v. Trahan, 45 Conn. App. 722, 732 , 697 A.2d 1153 (“only right that the defendant may earn under the accelerated rehabilitation statute is the right to a dismissal of the charges against him, a right that is expressly conditioned on satisfactory completion of the period of probation” [internal quotat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Murphy
See Mulla v. Maguire, supra, 65 Conn. App. 535 ; see also Castonguay v. Plourde, 46 Conn. App. 251, 263 , 699 A.2d 226 (“terms of a covenant . . . cannot be construed in a vacuum, but are to be understood in context”), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 931 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Southbury Land Trust, Inc. v. Andricovich
See, e.g., Castonguay v. Plourde, 46 Conn. App. 251, 262 , 699 A.2d 226 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 931 , 701 A.2d 660 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALLEN YOUNG
v.
ALLEN YOUNG
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 30, 1997.
Lisa J. Steele, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 925 (AC 15767), is denied.