Lach v. Welch, 713 A.2d 830 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Lach v. Welch, 713 A.2d 830 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Holmes v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2008-05-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Holmes v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 584-85 , 706 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National Bank
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586 , 706 A.2d 989 (“[a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly”), cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State v. Henton
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 584-85 , 706 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Town of Groton v. Lewis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Such a litigant is bound by the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law.” (Citation omitted.) Cersosimo v. Cersosimo, 188 Conn. 385, 394 , 449 A.2d 1026 (1982); see also Maloney v. Maloney, 17 Conn. App. 829, 830 , 553 A.2d 1169 (1989) (per curiam). “ ‘Although we allow pro se litigants some latitude, the right of self-representation provides no attendant license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law.’ Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586 , 706 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pollansky v. Coventry Pl. Zoning Comm., No. Cv 98 0066583s (Aug. 2, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co., 40 Conn. App. 36 , 45 , 668 A.2d 1346 (1996); see also Rodriouez v. Mallory Battery Co., 188 Conn. 145 , 149 , 448 A.2d 829 (1982) ("[a]ssignments of error which are merely mentioned but not briefed beyond a statement of the claim will be deemed abandoned and will not be reviewed by [the] court") Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568 , 585-86 , …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SHANNON LACH
v.
RICHARD J. WELCH, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF MICHAEL R. WELCH)
SC 15890.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 18, 1998.
713 A.2d 830
Frederic E. Mascolo, in support of the petition., Brian T. Henebry, James T. Wu, Kenneth J. Bartschi and Susan M. Cormier, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition of the defendants Richard J. Welch and Patricia Welch for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17579) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal for lack of a final judgment?”

MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.