green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Red Bell Brewing Co. v. Buchanan Ingersoll P.C.
Cf. Pompei v. Williams, 731 A.2d 133, 135 (Pa. Super. 1999) (party held responsible for breach of sales agreement is not estopped from bringing a claim against counsel based on allegations of inadequate legal representation).
discussed
Cited "see"
R. Moton v. K. Boockvar ~ Appeal of: L. Hoopes & G. Stenstrom
See Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 702 A.2d 1131 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996), aff’d, Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 731 A.2d 133 (Pa. 1999) (holding that courts will dismiss an appeal as moot unless an actual case or controversy exists at all stages of the judicial or administrative process).
cited
Cited "see"
Rajan, R. v. Crawford, A.
See Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania PUC, 702 A.2d 1131, 1135 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1997), affirmed, 731 A.2d 133 (Pa. 1999) (affirming on the Commonwealth Court’s opinion); see also Maryland Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
Public Defender's Office v. Venango County Court of Common Pleas
(2×)
See Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania PUC, 702 A.2d 1131 (1996), affirmed, Sierra Club v. PUC, 557 Pa. 11 , 731 A.2d 133 (1999) (holding that courts will dismiss an appeal as moot unless an actual case or controversy exists at all stages of the judicial or administrative process).
cited
Cited "see"
Warrington Township v. Powell
See Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 702 A.2d 1131 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997), ajfd, 557 Pa. 11 , 731 A.2d 133 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nichols, C. v. Main Line Hospitals
See also Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm., 731 A.2d 133 (Pa. 1999) (holding that courts will dismiss an appeal as moot when no actual case or controversy remains pending).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SIERRA CLUB, the Commission on Economic Opportunity of Luzerne County, and Eric Joseph Epstein, Appellants,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellees.
v.
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellees.
Flaherty, C.J., and Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman and Saylor.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
John F. Povilaitis, Chief Counsel, Bohdan R. Pankiew, 1st Dep. Chief Counsel, Kevin J. Moody, Asst. Counsel, Ramona C. Cataldi, Harrisburg, for Public Utility Com'n.
Alan J. Barak, Harrisburg, for Sierra Club, et al.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
Prior report: Pa.Cmwlth., 702 A.2d 1131.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
The order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed on the basis of Judge Leadbetter's opinion.