green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Palumbo v. Barbadimos
See Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 51 Conn. App. 627 , 632–33, 724 A.2d. 531 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 904 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vasquez
See State v. Middlebrook, 51 Conn. App. 711, 720-21 , 725 A.2d 351 (once evidence sufficient to infer consciousness of guilt admitted, jury left to consider any ambiguity), cert. denied, 248 Conn. 910 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Montanaro v. ASPETUCK LAND TRUST, INC.
In Connecticut, the term primary jurisdiction applies both to situations in which the court retains jurisdiction over a case but refers particular questions to the relevant administrative agency; see Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 51 *241 Conn. App. 627, 636-37, 724 A.2d 531 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 904 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999); and where, as here, a court declines to hear a matter because the matter is better determined initially by an administrative agency.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stavrakis
See State v. Middlebrook, 51 Conn. App. 711, 720-21 , 725 A.2d 351 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 910 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.
See Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 51 Conn. App. 627, 633 , 724 A.2d 531 (trier may accept or reject all, part or none of witness’ testimony), cert. denied, 248 Conn. 904 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gordon
See State v. Peterson, 51 Conn. App. 645 , 725 A.2d 333 (appeal arising from trial court’s failure to advise defendant on minimum sentences for crimes to which he pleaded guilty), cert. denied, 248 Conn. 905 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lugo
See State v. Williams, supra, 60 Conn. App. 581 . “[T]o discern whether the defendant’s claims are sufficient to satisfy the third prong of the Golding test, we must determine whether the defendant was aware of actual sentencing possibilities, and, if not, whether accurate information would have made any difference in his decision to enter a [guilty] plea.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Peterson, 51 Conn. App. 645, 656-57 , 725 A.2d 333 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 905 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999); see also State v. Domian, supra, 235 Conn. 688 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ormsby v. Frankel
See State v. Middlebrook, 51 Conn. App. 711, 726 , 725 A.2d 351 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 910 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Schlosser
See, e.g., State v. Holmes, 78 Conn. App. 479, 487 , 827 A.2d 751 (because ‘‘[t]he court’s canvass . . . adequately informed [the defendant] that he possessed a right against self-incrimination that guaranteed that he need not incriminate himself by entering a plea of guilty . . . the defendant has failed to establish the existence of plain error’’), App. 645, 659, 725 A.2d 333 (‘‘[p]lain error review is not warranted . . . because the defendant has failed to show that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly or voluntarily’’), cert. denied, 248 Conn. 905 , 731 A.2d 310 (199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jordan
“The first two questions relate to whether a defendant’s claim is reviewable, and the last two relate to the substance of the actual review.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Williams, 60 Conn. App. 575, 578-79 , 760 A.2d 948 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 922 , 763 A.2d 1043 (2000); see also State v. Peterson, 51 Conn. App. 645, 654 , 725 A.2d 333 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 905 , 731 A.2d 310 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FRED WHEELER
v.
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 17, 1999.
Thomas V. Battaglia, Jr., in support of the petition., Robyn L. Sondak, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19042) is denied.