Riggio v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 759 A.2d 507 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Riggio v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 759 A.2d 507 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Chioffi v. Martin (connappct, 2018-04-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Chioffi v. Martin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spector v. Konover , 57 Conn. App. 121 , 126, 747 A.2d 39 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 913 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Marshall v. Sawicki
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spector v. Konover, 57 Conn. App. 121, 126 , 747 A.2d 39 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 913 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Mangiante v. Niemiec
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spector v. Konover, 57 Conn. App. 121, 126-27 , 747 A.2d 39 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 913 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Springfield Oil Services, Inc. v. Conlon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spector v. Konover, 57 Conn. App. 121, 127 , 747 A.2d 39 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 913 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000).
cited Cited "see" State v. Faraday
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lewis, 58 Conn. App. 153, 157-58 , 752 A.2d 1144 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 917 , 759 A.2d 508 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Caldrello (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Riggio v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 58 Conn. App. 309, 313, 753 A.2d 423 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 917 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Noble v. White
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spector v. Konover, 57 Conn. App. 121 , 123 n.4, 747 A.2d 39 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 913 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Reilly
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lewis, 58 Conn. App. 153, 157 , 752 A.2d 1144 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 917 , 759 A.2d 508 (2000). “[T]he interpretation of a probation condition and whether it affords a probationer fair warning of the conduct proscribed thereby are essentially mat ters of law and, therefore, give rise to de novo review on appeal.” United States v. Gallo, 20 F.3d 7, 11 (1st Cir. 1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rivera
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Dobson, 221 Conn. 128, 138 , 602 A.2d 977 (1992) (‘‘narcotics convictions are crimes which do not reflect directly on the credibility of one who has been con- victed of them’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also State v. Lambert, 58 Conn. App. 349, 357 , 754 A.2d 182 (evidence of drug dealing is not relevant to veracity), cert. denied, 254 Conn. 915 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000); State v. Jaynes, 35 Conn. App. 541 , 553–55, 645 A.2d 1060 (evidence that witness had drug addiction did not require trial court to give instruction that drug addiction could be considered in …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Calabrese
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
We also disagree with the state’s contention that the answering machine messages were inadmissible because “[a] witness may be impeached by evidence of specific acts of misconduct that relate to veracity, but not by those that merely illustrate general bad behavior.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Grant, 89 Conn. App. 635, 643 , 874 A.2d 330 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 903 , 882 A.2d 678 (2005); see also State v. Lambert, 58 Conn. App. 349, 357 , 754 A.2d 182 (drug dealing and prostitution by victim not relevant to question of victim’s veracity or “to any substantive or m…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Cadle Company v. Gabel, No. Cv-00-0091155 (Mar. 11, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Spector v. Konover, 57 Conn. App. 121 , 133 , 747 A.2d 39 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 913 , 759 A.2d 507 (2000) (finding that "[t]he defendants were unjustly enriched through their misuse of . . . assets, and a constructive trust is an appropriate remedy.").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VIRGINIA RIGGIO
v.
ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2000.
759 A.2d 507
Linda L. Morkan, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Fitzgerald, in opposition.
Published

No opinion found.Click here to view source material.