green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marcello E.
(2×)
It is axiomatic that a factfinder may infer an intent to cause serious physical injury from circumstantial evidence such as the type of weapon used, the manner in which it was used, the type of wound inflicted and the events leading up to and immediately following the incident.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Vasquez, 68 Conn. App. 194, 207 , 792 A.2d 856 (2002); accord State v. Madagoski, 59 Conn. App. 394 , 399–400, 757 A.2d 47 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 924 , 767 A.2d 100 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Joseph B.
(2×)
See State v. Madagoski , 59 Conn. App. 394 , 404, 757 A.2d 47 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 924 , 767 A.2d 100 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Walker
See State v. Jones , 59 Conn. App. 762 , 766, 757 A.2d 689 (2000) ("[i]f an identification of a defendant is done spontaneously and is not arranged by the police, the identification is not tainted by state action and due process rights are not violated"), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 924 , 767 A.2d 99 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vumback
(2×)
See State v. Madagoski, 59 Conn. App. 394, 404-405 , 757 A.2d 47 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 924 , 767 A.2d 100 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carlos C.
Without the necessary factual and legal conclusions furnished by the trial court ... any decision made by us respecting [the defendant's claims] would be entirely speculative." [Internal quotation marks omitted.] ); see also State v. Torres, 60 Conn.App. 562 , 571, 761 A.2d 766 (2000) (claim that trial judge improperly permitted victim to sit back in witness chair, out of view of defendant, not reviewable because record inadequate and review would require speculation), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 925 , 767 A.2d 100 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction
It is incumbent upon the appellant to take the necessary steps to sustain its burden of providing an adequate record for appellate review.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Fuller v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 598, 602 , 785 A.2d 1143 (2001); see also Practice Book § 61-10. 2 “Our role is not to guess at possibilities, but to review claims based on a complete factual record developed by a [habeas] court.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres, 60 Conn. App. 562, 571 , 761 A.2d 766 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 925 , 767 A.2d 100 (2001)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bryant
“That test requires (1) demonstration that the witness is unavailable to testify at trial, and (2) adequate indicia of reliability of the previous testimony.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Munoz, 233 Conn. 106, 148 , 659 A.2d 683 (1995) (Berdon, J., concurring); see also State v. Torres, 60 Conn. App. 562, 574 , 761 A.2d 766 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 925 , 767 A.2d 100 (2001), citing State v. Williams, 231 Conn. 235, 248 , 645 A.2d 999 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DUANE LOCKHART
v.
DUANE LOCKHART
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 3, 2001.
Jeffrey D. Brownstein, in support of the petition., Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 119 (AC 18184), is denied.
Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided January 3, 2001