Webster Bank v. Zak, 769 A.2d 61 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Webster Bank v. Zak, 769 A.2d 61 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sakon v. Connecticut (ctd, 2025-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sakon v. Connecticut
D. Conn. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., at 283–84, 763 A.2d 1062 ; see also McElwee v. Orange, 700 F.3d 635, 641 (2d Cir. 2012) (“[a]lthough a public entity must make reasonable accommodations, it does not have to provide a disabled individual with every accommodation he requests or the accommodation of his choice” (internal quotation marks omitted)).
discussed Cited "see" F. S. v. J. S.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 283–84; see also McElwee v. Orange, 700 F.3d 635, 641 (2d Cir. 2012) (‘‘[a]lthough a public entity must make reasonable accommodations, it does not have to provide a disabled individual with every accommodation he requests or the accommoda- tion of his choice’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)).
cited Cited "see" In re Emily S.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Ashley S., 61 Conn. App. 658, 667 , 769 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 950 , 769 A.2d 61 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Riddick v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Riddick, 61 Conn. App. 275, 277 , 763 A.2d 1062 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 946 , 769 A.2d 61 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Spyke
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Riddick, 61 Conn. App. 275, 291 , 763 A.2d 1062 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 946 , 769 A.2d 61 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Green
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smart, 37 Conn. App. 360, 376 , 656 A.2d 677 , cert, denied, 233 Conn. 914 , 659 A.2d 187 (1995).” State v. Riddick, 61 Conn. App. 275, 291 , 763 A.2d 1062 , cert, denied, 255 Conn. 946 , 769 A.2d 61 (2001).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Rayhall v. Akim Co.
Conn. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Daly v. DelPonte, supra, 225 Conn. 513 -14; see also State v. Riddick, 61 Conn. App. 275, 284-85 , 763 A.2d 1062 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 946 , 769 A.2d 61 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alvarado v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, we must make every reasonable presumption in favor of the proper exercise of the trial court’s discretion.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McKnight, 191 Conn. 564, 576-77 , 469 A.2d 397 (1983); see also State v. Rid-dick, 61 Conn. App. 275, 282 , 763 A.2d 1062 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 946 , 769 A.2d 61 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Roman
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, we must make every reasonable presumption in favor of the proper exercise of the trial court’s discretion.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McKnight, 191 Conn. 564, 576-77 , 469 A.2d 397 (1983); see also State v. Riddick, 61 Conn. App. 275, 282 , 763 A.2d 1062 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 946 , 769 A. 2d 61 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WEBSTER BANK
v.
JOANNA V. ZAK
SC 16489.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 28, 2001.
769 A.2d 61
Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition., Jeffrey T. Beatty, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 402 (AC 20906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for factual findings regarding the standing of the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., and ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[*947] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16489. Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition. Jeffrey T. Beatty, in opposition. Decided February 28, 2001