Murray v. Taylor, 783 A.2d 1029 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Murray v. Taylor, 783 A.2d 1029 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
60 citation events (60 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ammar I. v. Evelyn W. (connappct, 2024-09-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ammar I. v. Evelyn W.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinchbeck v. Dept. of Public Health, 65 Conn. App. 201, 209 , 782 A.2d 242 (‘‘[i]n the absence of any disputed facts pertaining to jurisdiction, a court is not obligated to hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing an action for lack of jurisdic- tion’’), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001). 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 7 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 9 Ammar I. v. Evelyn W. prior to the commencement of this child custody pro- ceeding—the state of North Carolina possessed home state jurisdiction over visitation petitions involving them.
discussed Cited "see" Jefferson Solar, LLC v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental Protection
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinchbeck v. Dept. of Public Health, 65 Conn. App. 201, 206 , 782 A.2d 242 (holding that § 4-175 did not authorize plaintiff to bring declaratory judgment action because ‘‘[s]he did not ask the [trial] court to decide whether a regulation is valid or whether a regulation, statute or decision applied to the facts of [her] case’’), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc., 258 Conn. 930 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001) (“[t]he petition by the [association] for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court ... is denied” [citation omitted]).
cited Cited "see" Whitaker v. Taylor
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. Taylor, 65 Conn. App. 300, 335 , 782 A.2d 702 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Catalina v. Nicolelli
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. Taylor, 65 Conn. App. 300, 335 , 782 A.2d 702 (court improperly set aside verdict in plaintiffs favor when it allowed defaulted defendant to contest allegations, finding of proximate cause), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Commissioner of Social Services v. Smith
Conn. · 2003 · signal: accord · confidence high
The result of a default is an admission of “the truth of the material facts alleged in the complaint which are essential to entitle the plaintiff to some of the relief prayed.” United National Indemnity Co. v. Zullo, 143 Conn. 124, 130 , 120 A.2d 73 (1956); accord Murray v. Taylor, 65 Conn. App. 300, 335 , 782 A.2d 702 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Brown
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. Taylor, 65 Conn. App. 300, 331 , 782 A.2d 702 (standard regarding nonconstitutional questions), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Pinchbeck v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinchbeck v. Dept, of Public Health, 65 Conn. App. 201 , 782 A.2d 242 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Bonan v. Goldring Home Inspections, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. Taylor, 65 Conn. App. 300, 328 , 782 A.2d 702 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Mitchell v. Silverstein
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc., 65 Conn. App. 46 , 57 n.9, 782 A.2d 141 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 930 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tanpiengco v. Tasto
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
After reciting the “cigarette rule,” which is the standard by which Connecticut courts measure whether conduct is unfair under CUTPA; see, e.g., Murray v. Taylor, 65 Conn. App. 300, 337 , 782 A.2d 702 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001); the court held that the “representations made to [the] Tanpiengcos were material and deceptive.” John Houston, a former tenant of the property, testified that Fappiano knew that the property abutted a former landfill.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAUL MURRAY
v.
RODERICK G. TAYLOR
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2001.
783 A.2d 1029
William C. Franklin, in support of the petition., Edward F. Hennessey, in opposition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 300 (AC 19569), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.