green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Melcon
See First National Bank of Chicago v. Luecken, 66 Conn. App. 606, 608 , 785 A.2d 1148 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 915 , 792 A.2d 851 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction
Because it is pri- marily the responsibility of defense counsel to advise the defendant of his right to testify and thereby to ensure that the right is protected, we believe the appro- priate vehicle for claims that the defendant’s right to testify was violated by defense counsel is [through] a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel [pursuant to] Strickland v. Washington, [supra] 466 U.S. 668 . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Commissioner of Correction v. Rodriquez, 222 Conn. 469, 476 , 610 A.2d 631 (1992); see also Braham v. Commissioner of Cor- rection, 72 Conn. App. 1 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Wells Fargo Bank v. McKoy, No. Cv 02 0188087 (Dec. 3, 2002)
See General Statutes § 49-15 6 Farmers Mechanics Bank v. Kneller. 40 Conn. App. 115 , 124 , 670 A.2d 324 (1996), sets forth the general principal that after a law day passes and there is a failure to redeem, "the equity of redemption is extinguished and title to the property vests absolutely in the plaintiff." Furthermore, ["w]hen a motion to open . . . [is] filed after title has vested in an encumbrancer, no practical relief can be granted so the appeal becomes moot." First National Bank of Chicago v. Luecken, 66 Conn. App. 606 , 612 , 785 A.2d 1148 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 915 , 792 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conde v. Commissioner of Correction
The reasonableness of an investigation must be evaluated not through hindsight but from the perspective of the attorney when he was conducting it.” State v. Talton, 197 Conn. 280, 297-98 , 497 A.2d 35 (1985); see also Tatum v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 61, 66 , 783 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 937 , 785 A.2d 232 (2001). “[T]here is a strong presumption that the trial strategy employed by a criminal defendant’s counsel is reasonable and is a result of the exercise of professional judgment . . . .” (Citation omitted.) Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction, 67 Conn.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Fargo Bank of Minnesota, N.A. v. Morgan
Compare Connecticut Savings Bank v. Howes, supra, *82 9 Conn. App. 447 -48 (dismissing appeal of foreclosure by sale as moot where stay of execution pending appeal was lifted and title was transferred to plaintiff) with First National Bank of Chicago v. Luecken, 66 Conn. App. 606, 614 , 785 A.2d 1148 (2001) (dismissing appeal as moot where defendant sought to open judgment of strict foreclosure after close of business on final law day), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 915 , 792 A.2d 851 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MICHAEL IOVIENO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 17, 2002.
Todd A. Edgington, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The petitioner Michael Iovieno’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 126 (AC 19794), is denied.
KATZ and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.