Hamilton v. Hennessey, 800 A.2d 927 (Pa. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Hamilton v. Hennessey, 800 A.2d 927 (Pa. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McNaughton v. McNaughton (pactcompldauphi, 2005-07-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McNaughton v. McNaughton
pactcompldauphi · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamilton v. Hennessey, 783 A.2d 852 (Pa. Commw. 2001) (en banc), aff’d, 569 Pa. 101 , 800 A.2d 927 (2003) (per curiam); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408, 418, 421 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Orie
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hamilton v. Hennessey, 783 A.2d 852 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001) (Speech or Debate Clause does not preclude discovery regarding whether newsletters were “campaign expenses” under Election Code), aff'd, 569 Pa. 101 , 800 A.2d 927 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. Hank HAMILTON, Democratic Candidate for State Representative in the 26th Legislative District and John Beemer, Chairman of the Chester County Democratic Party, and Thomas Bosak and Thomas Fulton and Brenda B. Treadwell,
v.
Tim HENNESSEY and Friends of Tim Hennessey and Carol Hennessey, Treasurer, Friends of Tim Hennessey, Appeal of Pennsylvania House Republican Caucus, Intervenor.
116 MAP 2001.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 31, 2002.
800 A.2d 927
Per Curiam.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.