State v. Rivera, 806 A.2d 50 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Rivera, 806 A.2d 50 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Williams (connappct, 2004-01-13) · Strongest negative: State v. Daley (connappct, 2004-02-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Daley
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see State v. Winer, 69 Conn. App. 738 , 796 A.2d 491 (affording review of untimely postsentence motion to withdraw plea without discussion of limitation imposed by Practice Book § 39-26), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 909 , 806 A.2d 50 (2002).
examined Cited "see" State v. Williams (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rivera, 70 Conn. App. 203 , 207 n.5, 797 A.2d 586 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 910 , 806 A.2d 50 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kukucka (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
We note that "the failure to preserve a photographic array does not preclude a finding that an identification procedure was not suggestive." State v. Hunt , 10 Conn. App. 404 , 408, 523 A.2d 514 (1987) ; see also State v. Rivera , 70 Conn. App. 203 , 209, 797 A.2d 586 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 910 , 806 A.2d 50 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kukucka (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
We note that ‘‘the failure to preserve a photographic array does not preclude a finding that an identification procedure was not suggestive.’’ State v. Hunt, 10 Conn. App. 404, 408 , 523 A.2d 514 (1987); see also State v. Rivera, 70 Conn. App. 203, 209 , 797 A.2d 586 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 910 , 806 A.2d 50 (2002). 17 We further conclude from a review of the entire factual record that the admission of the Murray identification evidence, even if improper, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. ‘‘If the admission of eyewitness identifi- cation testimony is deemed to be improper, …
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Blango
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Winer, 69 Conn. App. 738, 745 , 796 A.2d 491 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 909 , 806 A.2d 50 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALBERT RIVERA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 17, 2002.
806 A.2d 50
William B. Westcott, special public defender, in support of the petition., LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 203 (AC 19998), is denied.

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 17, 2002