green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carrion
See part II of the majority opinion. 4 Although this court has previously not determined, at least expressly, whether the use of this language is permissible, the Appellate Court, in State v. Wilson, 71 Conn. App. 110 , 120–21, 800 A.2d 653 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 905 , 810 A.2d 272 (2002), determined that trial courts should avoid using such language.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arnold v. Moriarty
Further, it is not unreasonable for a jury to determine that a plaintiff has proved some elements of his or her cause of action without proving them all; see Macy v. Lucas, 72 Conn. App. 142, 150-51 , 804 A.2d 971 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 905 , 810 A.2d 272 (2002); and in such a situation a defendant’s verdict is proper.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chizmada v. Scandone, No. 358640 (Jan. 30, 2003)
See Mack v. LaValley , supra , 162; see also Clay v. Teach , supra , 560." Macy v. Lucas, 72 Conn. App. 142 , 151 , 804 A.2d 971 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 905 , 810 A.2d 272 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JACALYN MACY
v.
KEITH LUCAS
v.
KEITH LUCAS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 29, 2002.
Alan Scott Picket, in support of the petition., Karen L. Karpie, in opposition.
Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.