green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rider v. Rider
See Towbin v. Board of Examin- ers of Psychologists, 71 Conn. App. 153, 177 , 801 A.2d 851 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 908 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002). 14 General Statutes § 45a-128 (c) provides that ‘‘[u]pon any modification or revocation there shall be the same right of and time for appeal as in the case of any other order or decree.’’
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Morales
See State v. William C., 71 Conn. App. 47 , 71 n.12, 801 A.2d 823 , cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 907 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. William B.
See State v. William C., 71 Conn. App. 47, 62 , 801 A.2d 823 (access to confidential records should be left to discretion of trial court), cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 907 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002); State v. Manini, 38 Conn. App. 100, 114 , 659 A.2d 196 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 99 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wright
See State v. William C., 71 Conn. App. 47 , 54 n.5, 801 A.2d 823 , cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 907 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Samuels
See State v. William C., 71 Conn. App. 47, 71 , 801 A.2d 823 , cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 907 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gonzalez
See State v. William C., 71 Conn. App. 47, 62 , 801 A.2d 823 (access to confidential records should be left to discretion of trial court), cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 907 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002); State v. Manini, 38 Conn. App. 100, 114 , 659 A.2d 196 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 99 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tang v. Bou-Fakhreddine
(2×)
See Kronberg Bros., Inc. v. Steele, 72 Conn. App. 53, 59-60 , 804 A.2d 239 (defective notice of cancellation rights in contract sufficient for award under CUTPA), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912 , 810 A.2d 277 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monti v. Wenkert
Accordingly, we do not resort to “assumptions” and “conjecture” when analyzing the basis of a jury’s verdict. 9 See Rosenblatt v. Berman, 143 Conn. 31, 37 , 119 A.2d 118 (1955); see also McNamee v. Woodbury Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, 193 Conn. 15, 26 , 475 A.2d 262 (Healey, J., concurring) (“[a]s a general rule, a strong presumption of regularity attaches to every step of a civil proceeding, including jury deliberations, and the burden is on the party seeking a new trial to show affirmatively that irregularity exists” [internal quotation marks omitted]), on appeal aft…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance
See, e.g., Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 474 , 806 A.2d 546 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912 , 810 A.2d 278 (2002); see also 2 Restatement (Second), Torts § 343, pp. 215-18 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chaves v. Arthur, No. Cv02 039 08 89 S (Feb. 20, 2003)
See also Kronberg Brothers, Inc. v. Steele , 72 Conn. App. 53 , 59-60 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912 (2002) (plaintiff's failure to include transaction date in the contract and transaction and cancellation dates in notice of cancellation and its failure to position notice in immediate proximity to the space reserved in the contract for the signature of the buyer constitutes material noncompliance with the act's requirements).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KRONBERG BROTHERS, INC.
v.
JOHN STEELE
v.
JOHN STEELE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 13, 2002.
Jon D. Biller, in support of the petition., Bradley K. Cooney, in opposition.
Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.